期刊文献+

对胃癌手术中不同淋巴结清除术的合理评价 被引量:33

Rational evaluation of different lymph node dissection
原文传递
导出
摘要 行胃癌根治切除术371例,对其不同淋巴结清除术(D_1、D_2、D_3)作了疗效评价与适应证探讨。结果表明,Ia期胃癌行D_1或D_1式淋巴结清除术即可;Ib期胃癌行D_2式清除术为宜;II+III期限局型或团块状生长胃癌,D_3、D_2比D_1式清除术为佳。IV期此型胃癌,D_3+D_2式清除术后5年生存率尚可达42.9%;然而,II+III期浸润型、弥漫状生长者,D_3、D_2式清除术也难明显提高疗效。淋巴结无转移者不必行扩大清除术。淋巴结少数转移或第1站转移者,D_3、D_2式清除术为佳。多数转移或第2站转移者,D_3比D_2、D_1式为佳,广泛转移(10个以上或第3站转移)者,D_3、D_2式清除术疗效亦较差。 o evaluate the effect and indication of diffferentlymph node dissection (D1 . D2 .D3) , we perfermed radi-cal operations for 3il cases of gastric cancer. The re-sults showed that D1 or D1 lymph node dissection wasenough for gastric cancer of ia stage, D2 was suitable forIb stage. For localized or massive type gastric cancer ofⅡ+Ⅲ stage, D3, D2 dissection was better than D1 dis-section. For the gastric cancer of the same type in Ⅳstage. the 5-year survival rate after D3 +D2dissectionwas 42. 9% , but for the gastric cancer of infihrativetype or diffused growth pattern in Ⅱ+Ⅲ stage, the ef-fect was not significantly increased even after the D3 ,D2dissection. For the gastric cancer of this type in Ⅳstage, the effect was not improved after the extendedlymph node dissection. Extended dissection needn’t beperformed if there was no lymph node metastasis. D3,D2 dissection was better if there was little lymph nodemetastasis or the metastasis was limited to lst group.For those metastasized to 2nd group or the quantity wasmore , D3 was better than D2 ,D1. The effect of D3, D2dissection was not significantly improved in the exten-sive metastasis case (more than 10 or to the 3rd group).
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1995年第2期110-113,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 胃肿瘤 淋巴结切除术 外科 手术 Stomach neoplasms Lymph nodeexcision Surgery, operative
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Chen J Q,Chin J Cancer Res,1991年,3卷,45页
  • 2陈峻青,实用外科杂志,1989年,9卷,478页
  • 3刘庆华,中华肿瘤杂志,1988年,10卷,430页

同被引文献164

引证文献33

二级引证文献258

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部