期刊文献+

脑下垂体阻滞术的临床应用 被引量:5

CLNICAL APPLICATION OF NEUROADENOLYSIS OF PITUITARY GLAND
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用脑下垂体阻滞术于一例全身性顽痛及四例癌痛的治疗,获得满意效果。经X线检查了解蝶窦、蝶鞍、筛窦所见,并用鼻镜确认鼻腔有无异常,据此选定拟穿刺的鼻孔。平卧全麻后在X线电视荧光屏下,用特制的脑下垂体双重套针行经鼻脑下垂体穿刺,针尖穿过鞍底到鞍内脑下垂体后,注入造影剂并拍片确认针位正确,注入无水乙醇1.8~2.0ml。分别用于全身性顽痛、宫颈癌Ⅲ期b、转移性肺癌、外阴癌、卵巢癌痛。本组5例平均疼痛记分(PainScore)从10降至2.6,疼痛消失或减轻。提示该法首选于激素依赖性癌痛,也可用于非激素依赖性癌痛及全身顽痛的治疗。 Five patients,one with whole body obstinate pain and four with cancer pain were treated by neuroadenolysis of the pituitary gland(NALP).The effects were satisfactory.X-ray examination was performed before NALP to find out the conditions of the sphenoid sinus,sphenoid saddle and ethmoid sinus.Nasal cavities were checked with the nasal mirror.According to the results of preliminary examinations the right or left nasal cavity was selected as route of penetration.The patient lay down on the X-ray table at supine position.After general anesthesia under X-ray fluroscopy the double needle of NALP was inserted into the sphenoidal sinus.Radiographol was injected to assure the correct position of the needle placement,and 1.8~2.0ml of dehydrated alcohol was injected into the pituitary.The method was used to patients with whole body obstainate pain,and uterocervical cancer Ⅲ/b,metastasic lung cancer,vulvar vaginal cancer and ovarian cancer,respectively,The degree of pain relief was assessed by the pain score.the mean pain score changed from 10 down to 2.6 after the treatment.The authors suggested that hormone related cancer is the first choice for NALP,followed by non-hormonrelated cancer pain and whole body obstinate pain.
出处 《中国疼痛医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 1995年第1期23-25,共3页 Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine
关键词 脑下垂体阻滞术 疼痛 癌痛 Neuroadenolysis pituitary gland Cancer Pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1严相默等.临床疼痛学[M]延边人民出版社,1988.

同被引文献31

  • 1柴玫,严相默.脑下垂体阻滞术治疗复杂性区域疼痛综合征5例报告[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2005,11(5):312-313. 被引量:1
  • 2严相默 主编.临床疼痛学 修订版[M].延吉:延边人民出版社,1996.217-230.
  • 3十时忠秀 安里文雄.癌性疼痛[M].东京:金原出版株式会社,1985.108-116.
  • 4严相默.脑下垂体阻滞治疗癌痛与全身顽痛[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1994,(5):362-362.
  • 5Henry JL, Lalloo C,Yashpal K. Central poststroke pain: an abstruse outcome. Pain Res Manag, 2008,13 : 41-49.
  • 6Leijon G, Boivie J. Central post-stroke pain-a controlled trial of amitriptyline and carbamazepine. Pain, 1989,36 : 27-36.
  • 7ShimodozonoM, KawahiraK, KamishitaT, et al. Reduction of central poststroke pain with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine. Int J Neurosci, 2002, 112: 1173-1181.
  • 8Frese A,Husstedt IW,Ringelstein EB, et al. Pharmacologic treatment of central post-stroke pain. Clin J Pain, 2006,22: 252-260.
  • 9Vestergaard K, Andersen G, Gottrup H, et al. Lamotrigine for central poststroke pain: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology, 2001,56 : 184-190.
  • 10Tai Q, Kirshblum S, Chen B, et al. Gabapentin in the treatment of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. J Spinal Cord Med, 2002,25 : 100-105.

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部