期刊文献+

汉滩病毒毒力标志的建立 被引量:2

ESTABLISHMENT OF MARKERS FOR VIRULENCEOF HANTAAN VIRUS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 比较了汉滩病毒A9株强毒克隆病毒与弱毒克隆病毒在体外培养、诱导中和抗体能力,以及单克隆抗体(单抗)反应谱等方面的差异。发现最为明显的区别在于弱毒克隆病毒对小鼠腹腔巨噬细胞及人外周血单核细胞敏感性降低,在Vero-E6细胞上繁殖缓慢,空斑形成需较长时间,且斑小。但强、弱毒克隆病毒的致细胞融合活性,刺激CTLs应答活性,以及时Vero-E6细胞的吸附速率与穿透力均无明显差别。经温度敏感(ts)试验及缺损干扰(DI)颗粒检测,表明弱毒克隆病毒为非ts株,不含DI颗粒。而弱毒克隆病毒免疫6~8周龄BALB/c小鼠,同样能诱导较高滴度的中和抗体。强、弱毒克隆病毒的单抗反应谱表明,除了对4株抗糖蛋白单抗的反应性有显著差异外,两克隆病毒对18株抗核蛋白单抗及18株抗糖蛋白单抗的反应性无显著差异。 ell culture prolifeation, ability for inducing neutralizing antibodies and McAb raictionprofile were compatal between the attenuated clone A39s and the virulent clone A9v ofHantaan virus isolate A9. Differences were found : the attenuated virus clone A39s lost itsinfectivity to peritoneal macrophages of BAlB/c mice and human peripheral bloodmononuclear leukocytes;A39s virus grew slowly on Vero-E6 cells, a longer time was neededto form plaques; and size of the plaques formed was much smaller than those of A9v virus.No significant alternations were observed in cell fusion function, stimulating cytotoxic cellactivity, the adsorption and penetration rate on Vero-E6 cell culture between A39s virusand A9v virus. It was demonstrated that A39s virus was not temperature-sensitive(ts)and contained no defective interfering particles(DIP). No substantial differences in antibodyresponse to these two viruses were observed, A39s virus could induce high titered neutralizingantibody and could cross-neutralize some other strains of Hantaan virus. Furthermore,theMcAb reaction profiles by indirect IFA and PRNT between these two viruses were compared.It was found that both had the same reactivity with 18 anti-nucleoprotein(NP)McAbsand 18 anti-glycoprotein(G)McAbs except 4 anti-G McAbs, 3D5, 6D4, 16DZ and 8F8which suggested that some genetic variations might have occurred on the glycoprotein of A39svirus, especially on the Gl glycoprotein.
出处 《病毒学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1995年第4期298-304,共7页 Chinese Journal of Virology
关键词 汉滩病毒 毒力标志 人体病毒 Hantaan virus, Markeis for virulence, Neutralizing antibody, McAb reactionprofile
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1邱建明,中华实验和临床病毒学杂志,1996年
  • 2詹发先,病毒学报,1992年,8卷,232页
  • 3聂子林,中国病毒学,1992年,7卷,27页
  • 4Lee H W,J E&HFRS BULLETIN,1989年,3卷,55页
  • 5梁米芳,病毒学报,1989年,5卷,217页
  • 6姚小剑,中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,1989年,9卷,309页
  • 7姚小剑,病毒学杂志,1988年,1卷,41页
  • 8汪力亚,第四军医大学学报,1988年,9卷,22页
  • 9陈伯权,中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,1985年,5卷,136页

同被引文献21

  • 1Schmaljohn C, Hjelle B. Hantaviruses: a global disease problem. Emerg Infect Dis, 1997,3 (2) : 95-104.
  • 2Wang H, Yoshimatsu K,Ebihara H,et al. Genetic diversity of hantaviruses isolated in China and characterization of novel hantaviruses isolated fi'om Niviventer confucianus and Rattus rattus. Virology, 2000,278 ( 2 ) : 332-345.
  • 3Zou Y, Xiao QY, Dong X, et al. Genetic analysis of hantaviruses carried by reed voles Microtus fortis in China. Virus Res, 2008, 137(1) : 122-128.
  • 4Vapalahti O, Mustonen J, Lundkvist A, et al. Hantavirus infections in Europe. Lancet Infect Dis, 2003,3 : 653-661.
  • 5McKee KT, Kim GR, Gree DE, et al. Hantaan virus infection in suckling mice:virologic and pathologic correlates. J Med Virol, 1985,17(2) : 107-117.
  • 6Araki K, Yoshimatsu K, Lee BH, et al. Hantavirus-specific CD8 ( + ) -T-cell responses in newborn mice persistently infected with hantaan virus. J Virol, 2003,77 (15) : 8408-8417.
  • 7Yon YC, Yeshimatsu K, Yoshida R, et al. Comparison of virulence between seoul virus strain SR-11 and hantaan virus strain 76-118 of havntavirus in newborn mice. Microbiol Immunol, 1993,37(7) :557-562.
  • 8王昭孝 付德庆 吕太富 等.流行性出血热病毒株在乳白小鼠脑内传代及其毒力的研究[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,1991,11(5):315-318.
  • 9Plyusnin A, Morzunov SP. Virus evolution and genetic diversity of hantaviruses and their rodent hosts. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 2001,256: 47-75.
  • 10Plyusnin A, Vapalahti O, Vaheri A. Hantaviruses: genome structure, expression and evolution. J Gen Virol, 1996,77 (11 ) : 2677-2687.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关主题

;
使用帮助 返回顶部