摘要
作者用透射电镜观察了14例瘤性浆膜腔积液,并与常规细胞学光镜检查进行了比较.结果,光镜诊断的胸腹膜转移性腺癌(AC)4例中,电镜证实其中3例为AC,1例为恶性间皮瘤(MM);光镜诊断的9例MM中,电镜诊断其中7例为MM,2例为AC.电镜技术的应用为区别瘤性胸腹水中瘤细胞的组织起源提供了客观的依据,解决了常规细胞学检查对AC和MM鉴别诊断的困难,提高了MM细胞学诊断的准确性.
Fourteen cases of tumorous effusion specimens were examined by EM and optical
microscopy inde-pendently. Nine effusions were identified as malignant mesothelioma( MM )by
routine cytologic examina-tion,while EM correctly diagnosed seven as MM and two as
metastatic adenocarcinoma (AC).In the four ef-fusions identified as AC by cytologic method,one
case was confirmed as MM by EM. EM resolved the differ-ential diagnosis of MM versus AC in
some cases in which routine cytologic examination could not.It showedthat in a diagnosis of
tumorous effusion,EM was superior to light microscopy in determining origin of
tu-mors,especially in establishing a correct diagnosis of MM.
出处
《第四军医大学学报》
1995年第2期134-136,共3页
Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University
关键词
胸膜腔积液
恶性间皮瘤
细胞学诊断
电子显微镜
pleural and abdominal
effusion
malignant mesothelioma
metastatic
adenocarcinoma
mi-croscopy,electron
cytodignosis