摘要
标准的K-EEVM或ASM算出的平面后台阶突扩通道粘性分离区长度比实验值低30%,原因在于该模型违反了边界条件的独立性原则。为此本文提出一能独立加入有关湍流结构的边界条件的K-ELAASM,问题得到圆满解决。与此相反,层流粘性分离流动的分离区的预测值常常过大,一个重要原因在于进口速度型与实际不符,但同样是由于边界条件原故。
The turbulent reattachment length downstream of a backward-facing step has been underpredicted about 30% by standard turbulence model K-E EVM or ASM, it is because the modelling principle of independence of the boundary conditions has been violated by these models. As a cure of this shortcoming, it is suggested that the traditional ASM could be corrected to be a K-E LAASM, in which the boundary conditions of turbulence structure can be specified independent of the mean velocity profile and turbulence intensity. In contrast to this, the laminar reattachment length is often overpredicted, since the practical upstream velocity profile is actually not as symmetric as usually assumed in computation, however, this is another kind of violation to the above principle of independence of boundary conditions.
出处
《工程热物理学报》
EI
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
1995年第2期161-165,共5页
Journal of Engineering Thermophysics
基金
国家自然科学基金
关键词
湍流结构
边界条件
后台阶突扩通道
分离流动
turbulence structure, boundary condition, backward-facing step,separated flow.