民事证据立法与辩论主义——兼论最高人民法院《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》之缺陷

The Legislation on Civil Evidence and Argumentum—— Discussing the flaw on A Certain Number Prescription on Evidence of Civil Litigation of the Supreme Court

辩论主义是当事人主义诉讼模式本质的理论概括，它落实到具体的证据制度上。一方面要求明确当事人的举证责任并严格限制法院调查证据的范围，另一方面就是要确立自认制度。作为民事审判改革的重大成果，最高人民法院《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》在上述两个方面均体现了辩论主义的要求，无疑具有重大意义，但其中的缺陷也是显而易见的。在未来的民事证据立法中，为体现辩论主义的要求，对其进行完善是十分必要的。

Argumentum summarizes the nature of the lawsuit model of magnetism. If putting into concrete system of evidence, it requests to definite agents' responsibility to raise evidence and limit the range of court to survey evidence on one side, and on the other side it requests to establish the Admission. As important achievement of the reform on trial way, the prescription of the Supreme Court reflects the demand of argumentum in both sides above and it has great importance undoubtedly, but the flaws among it is obviously. In order to reflect the demand to argumentum, it is necessary to perfect it.