期刊文献+

女性主义立场理论视野中的“强客观性” 被引量:1

Strong Objectivity in the Vision of Feminist Standpoint Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章的着眼点是女性主义理论自身的演进,重点考察的是女性主义经验主义以及立场理论。女性主义经验主义在取得了诸多积极成果的同时也暴露了自身的一些缺陷,立场理论则在此基础上作了批判性的发展,特别是哈丁提出的“强客观性”为规避相对主义提供了一种可能的策略。
作者 董林群
机构地区 浙江大学理学院
出处 《科学技术与辩证法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第4期79-81,85,共4页 Science Technology and Dialectics
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Joseph Rouse. New Philosophies of Science North America-Twenty Years Later[ A]. Journal for General Philosophy of Science [C]. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher 29,1998.99.
  • 2Helen Longino, Science as Social Knowledge[M]. New York: Princeton University Prms. 1989, chapter 3, chapter4, chapter 5.
  • 3Evelyn Fox Kaller, Reflectiorks on Gender and Science[M].New Haven and London: Yale University Press. 1995.7.
  • 4Donna Haraway, Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective[A]. Sandra Harding( eds. )The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader[C]. New York and London: Routledge, 2004.92.
  • 5Sandra Harding, Whc,se Science ? Whose Knowledge? [ M]. Ithaca and New York: Comell University Prms, 1991. 121 - 137.
  • 6Sandra Harding, Whose Science ? Whose Knowledge?[M]. Ithaca and New York: Comell University Press,1991. 143- 144.
  • 7大卫·布鲁尔.知识与社会意象[M].北京:东方出版社,2001.9-17.
  • 8Sandra Harding, Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology:“What Is Strong Objectivity”? [ A]. Linda Nicholson (eds.) Feminist Epistemologies [ C]. New York and London: Routledge, 1993.69.
  • 9Sandra Harding, Whose Science ? Whose Knowledge?[M]. Ithaca and New York: Comell University Press,1991. 156.
  • 10Dorma Haraway, Situated Knowledges:The Science Que-stion in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective[A]. Sandra Harding( eds. )The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader[C]. New York and London: Routledge, 2004.81 - 101.

共引文献1

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部