期刊文献+

产品稀缺信息对消费者购买行为影响之实证分析 被引量:20

The Effects of Scarce Message on Consumer Purchase Intentions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究利用2×2×2组间因子实验对不同类型的产品稀缺信息影响购买意图的效果及品牌概念和购买渠道对这种影响效果的调整作用等问题进行了实证分析。结果发现产品的限量销售信息比限时销售信息能更为有效地刺激消费者对稀缺产品的竞争购买心理和对产品价值的感知,两种稀缺信息对购买意图的影响效果差异在购买象征意义较强的品牌时更为显著。本研究结果可为营销人员利用稀缺信息提高促销效果提供借鉴和参考。 In this research, we use 2× 2 × 2 between-subjects experiments to examine the effects of time vs. quantity scarce messages on consumer purchase decisions. Two other variables are also studied as moderators to such effects: brand concept (functional vs. symbolic)and distribution channel (on-line vs. off-line) .The results show that quantity scarce messages have greater impact on consumers' purchase intention than time scarce messages since quantity scarce is more effective for provoking competition among consumers. In addition, the results show that there is a significant interaction effect between the type of scarce message and brand concept. The moderating effect of purchase channel, however, turns out to be not significant although its effect is directionally supported.
作者 金立印
机构地区 韩国培材大学
出处 《商业经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第8期39-44,共6页 Journal of Business Economics
关键词 稀缺信息 购买意图 品牌概念 销售渠道 scarce message purchase intention brand concept distribution channel
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Lynn Michael. Scarcity Enhancement of Desirability: The Role of Naive Economic Theories [ J ]. Basic Applied Social Psychology, 1992, (13): 67-78.
  • 2Brehm Sharon S., Jack W Brehm. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and control [ M ]. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
  • 3Cialdlni Robert B.. Influence: Science and Practice [ M ].Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman,1985.
  • 4Kelman Herbert C.. Attitude Change as a Function of Response Restriction[J]. Human Relations, 1953, (6): 185-214.
  • 5West Stephen G.. Increasing the Attractiveness of College Cafeteria Food: A Reactance Theory Perspective[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, (60) : 656 - 658.
  • 6Verhallen Theo M. M., Henry S. J. Robben. Scarcity and Preference: An Experiment on Unavailability and Product Evaluation[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 1994, ( 15 ) :315 - 331.
  • 7Inman J. Jeffrey, Anil c. Peter, Priya Raghubir. Framing the Deal: The Role of Restrictions in Accentuating Deal Value[J].Journal of Consumer Research, 1997, (24) : 68- 79.
  • 8Fromkin Howard L., Timothy C. Brock. A Commodity Theory Analysis of Persuasion [ J]. Representative Research in Social Psycholog , 1971, (2) : 47 - 57.
  • 9Fromkin Howard L.. Affective and Valuational Consequences of Self- Perceived Uniqueness Deprivation [ M ]. Ph. D.Dissertation, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, 1968.
  • 10Worchel, Stephen, Jerry Lee, Akanbi Adewole. Effects of Supply and Demand on Ratings of Object Value[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, (32) : 906 - 914.

同被引文献193

引证文献20

二级引证文献132

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部