期刊文献+

鼻咽癌综合治疗策略研究——749例疗效分析 被引量:45

A Study of the Combined Treatment Strategy for Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on the Analysis of the Treatment Results from 749 Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨鼻咽癌综合治疗策略。[方法]回顾性分析无远处转移初治鼻咽癌749例,按’92分期标准对所有病例重新分期。根据患者不同T、N组合的死亡风险比及生存情况,将病人分为5组:早期N0组(T1~2N0)、早期N1组(T1~2N1)、局部晚期组(T3~4N0~1)、区域晚期组(T1~2N2~3)、局部区域晚期组(T3~4N2~3)。比较各组的5年总生存率、5年累积局部区域复发率、远处转移率和死亡风险比等。[结果]早期N1组较早期N0组,5年总生存率明显下降(84.7%vs95.4%,P=0.005),5年远处转移率明显升高(10.8%vs0.1%,P=0.0004),死亡风险比分别为1和3.8;局部晚期组与区域晚期组比较,5年总生存率、累积远处转移率及累积局部区域复发率差异均无统计学意义穴61.4%vs63.9%、20.3%vs24.6%、19.1%vs15.6%,P>0.05雪,死亡风险比在同一层次,分别为10.1及10.0;局部区域晚期组5年总生存率仅48.2%,死亡风险比高达16.4。[结论]鼻咽癌的治疗应根据患者具体的T、N分期组合进行分层分析治疗,T1~2N0预后好,可予单纯放疗;T1~2N1病人应考虑放疗联合化疗的综合治疗,T3~4和/或N2~3患者有较高的复发及转移率,应增加放化疗综合治疗的强度。 [Purpose ]To explore the multimodality therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). [Methods]Seven hundred and forty-nine cases with non-metastatic NPC were retrospectively analyzed.All cases were restaged based on the Chinese staging system 1992. According to the death hazard ratios and survival rate of different combinations of T and N,patients were divided into five subgroups:early disease group with No (T1-2N0), early disease group with N1 (T1-2N1), advanced local disease group (T3-4N0-1), advanced nodal disease group (T1-2N2-3) and advanced locoregional disease group (T3-3N2-3). 5-year overall survival rate, 5-year cumulative locoregional failure rate, distant failure rate, and death hazard ratios were compared among subgroups. [Results I The early disease group with N1(T1-2N1) had a lower 5-year survival rate and a higher distant failure rate compared with the early disease group with No (T1-2N0) (84.7% vs. 95.4%,P=0.005, 0.1% vs. 10.8%, P=0.0004). The hazard ratios were 1 and 3.8,respectively. No significant difference was found with the 5-year overall survival rates, 5-year cumulative distant failure rates, and locoregional failure rates between advanced local disease group (T3-4N1-2) and advanced nodal disease group (T1-2N2-3)(61.4% vs 63.9%, 20.3% vs 24.6%, 19.1% vs 15.6%,respectively,P〉0.05). Their hazard ratios were in the same level with 10.1 and 10.0, respectively.For advanced locoregional disease group (T3-4N2-3), the 5-year overall survival rate was only 48.2% and the hazard ratio was as high as 16.4. [Conclusions]Stratification according to the accurate combinations of T and N,should be involved in the consideration of treatment strategy for NPC.The treatment results in patients with T1-2N0 were excellent, radiotherapy alone was enough.For patients with T1-2N1,chemoradiotherapy may be indicated.Poorer survival rate and higher relapse rate were observed among patients with T3-4 or/and N2-3, more aggressive therapy was recommended.
出处 《中国肿瘤》 CAS 2005年第8期538-542,共5页 China Cancer
基金 广东省科委社会发展攻关项目(N0.2003C30306)
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤 分层分析 综合疗法 nasopharyngeal neoplasms stratification analysis muhimodality therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Heng DMK, Wee J, Fong KW, et al. Prognostic factors in 677 patients in Singapore with nondisseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 1999, 86:1912-1920.
  • 2Ma J, Mai HQ, Hong MH, et al. Is the 1997 AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma prognostically useful for Chinese patient populations?[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2001,50:1181-1189.
  • 3Chan ATC, Teo PML, Ngan RKC, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy-radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma:progression-free survival analysis of a phase Ⅲ Randomized trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20: 2038-2044.
  • 4Lin JC, Jan JS, Hsu CY, et al. Phase Ⅲ study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: positive effect on overall and progression-free survival [J]. J Clin Oncol,2003, 21:631-637.
  • 5Al-Sarraf M, LeBlanc M, Giri PGS, et al. Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase Ⅲ randomized Intergroup Study 0099[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1998, 16:1310-1317.
  • 6C. Andrew van Hasselt. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma[M].2eds. Hong Kong: The Chinese university press, 1999.127-160.
  • 7Dora Kwong, Jonathan Sham, Domon Choy. The effect of Loco-regional control on distant metastatic dissemination in carcinoma of the nasopharynx: an analysis of 1301 patients[J]. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys, 1994, 30:1029-1036.
  • 8Nacy Lee, Ping Xia, Jeanne M, et al. Intensity-Modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the UCSF experience [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002, 53:12-19.
  • 9Michael Huncharek, Bruce Kupelnick. Combined chemoradiation versus radiation therapy alone in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma results of a metaanalysis of 1,528 patients from six randomized trials [J].Am J Clin Oncol, 2002,25(3): 219-223.
  • 10Langendijk JA, Leemans R,Buter J, et al. A meta-analysis of the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys, 2003,57(2):S246-247.

同被引文献414

引证文献45

二级引证文献650

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部