期刊文献+

基于偏序偏好的多属性群决策问题的综合权重 被引量:12

Synthesis weight for multi-attribute group decision making based on partial order preference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于偏序结构、属性值是用模糊语言给出且每个属性没有决定权重的多属性群决策问题提出了一种综合权重方法。该方法运用模糊集合理论求出每对方案关于每个属性的模糊偏好关系,然后通过对决策者的冲突偏好确定综合权重来解决该问题。当综合权重不存在时,需要调整决策者们的全部或部分偏好,以达到一致意见。该方法具有概念清晰,符合现实决策问题的特点,得出的综合权重能反映各个决策者对方案的偏好。最后给出了一个算例。 Based on partial order preference of groups, multi-attribute group decision making problem without determining weights are studied and attribute values are given using linguistic term. First, the fuzzy preference relation between alternatives for each criterion is worked out, and then this problem is solved through determining compromise weight and participants with conflicting preference. We need to adjust (to reverse or to withdraw) some or all of the preference from different participants when compromise weight is not be. The method has the clear concept and feasibility. The compromise weights obtained by the method reflect all participants' preference. Finally, a numerical exampie is used to show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第7期1243-1246,共4页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助课题(70371026)
关键词 多属性群决策 偏序 综合权重 偏好 multiple attribute group decision making partial order synthesis weights preference
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Gray P, Nunmaker J K. Group decision support systems[M]. Gray P,Jurison (eds). Productivity in the Office and the Factory. New York;Boyd and Fraser, 1995. 106-117.
  • 2Franz Ls, Reeves G R, Gonzalez J J. Group decision processes: MOLP procedures facilitating group and individual decision orientations[J]. Comput Opns. Res, 1992, 19: 695-706.
  • 3Iz P H. Two multiple criteria group support systems based on mathematical programming and ranking methods[J]. Eur. J. Opl. Res., 1992, 61: 245-253.
  • 4Madu C N. A quality confidence procedure for GDSS application in multi-criteria decision making[J]. IEE Trans., 1994, 26: 31-39.
  • 5Boiney L G. When efficient is insufficient: fairness in decisions affecting a group [J]. Mgmt. Sci., 1995, 41: 1523-1537.
  • 6Wei O L, Yan H. A compromise weight for multi-criteria group decision making with individual preference[J]. J. Opl. Res. Soc., 2000, 51: 625-634.
  • 7Yan H, Wei O L. Determining compromise weights for group decision making [J]. J. Opl. Res. Soc. 2002, 53: 680-687.
  • 8钱钢,徐泽水.三种基于理想点的不确定多属性决策优化模型[J].系统工程与电子技术,2003,25(5):517-519. 被引量:31
  • 9吕翔昊,李登峰.基于模糊信息的群体多维偏好分析决策模型[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004,26(5):605-607. 被引量:17
  • 10王坚强.信息不完全的Fuzzy群体多准则决策的规划方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004,26(11):1604-1608. 被引量:31

二级参考文献85

  • 1王应明,傅国伟.运用无限方案多目标决策方法进行有限方案多目标决策[J].控制与决策,1993,8(1):25-29. 被引量:70
  • 2王文平.不完备信息下的多目标优化方法研究[J].系统工程学报,1996,11(2):1-6. 被引量:17
  • 3陈珽.决策分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1987..
  • 4徐南荣 仲伟俊.科学决策理论与方法[M].南京:东南大学出版社,1996..
  • 5Hawng C L, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making[ M ]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg New York,1981.1-107.
  • 6Yoon K. The propagation of errors in multiple-attribute decision analysis: a practical approach[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1989,40(7):681-686.
  • 7Brson N, Mobolurin A. An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997,96:379-386.
  • 8Sajjad Z M. Incorporating the uncertainty of decision judgments in the analytic hierarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1991,53 :206-216.
  • 9Birkhoff G. Lattice theory[ M]. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, Volume XXV, Providence, 1973.1-280.
  • 10Arrow K. Social choice and individual values(2nd edn)[M]. New York:Wiley,1963.

共引文献112

同被引文献162

引证文献12

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部