摘要
根据刑法理论界的通说观点,我国刑法中紧急避险的必要限度被理解为:所保护的合法权益必须大于所损害的合法权益,两者相等也认为是超过了必要限度的。然而,对照紧急避险的刑法原理,这种不允许损害等值合法权益的观点并没有获得有力的刑法理论的支持。分析损害等值合法权益之避险行为的几种情况,来认定紧急避险的限度条件,总体上应当包括损害同等价值的合法权益。
According to general point in the field of Crimes Theory, the urgent danger escape in our country's crime law is understood as: the legal right protected by the law must be bigger than damaged legal right. Being equal is also considered as over the necessary limit. However, compare with the Crimes Law principle of urgent danger escape, such viewpoint as not permit damage equal value legal right hasn't gained strong crimes theory support. We can cognize that urgent danger escape limit conditions generally should include legal right of damaging equal value through analyzing several conditions of the behavior.
出处
《吉林公安高等专科学校学报》
2005年第4期64-66,共3页
Journal of Jilin Public Secunity Academy
关键词
紧急避险
必要限度
刑法原理
urgent danger escape
necessary limit
crimes law principle