期刊文献+

习惯的空间术语对空间认知的影响 被引量:23

The Effect of Spatial Language Habits on People's Spatial Cognition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用Levinson开创的旋转观察者的实验范式,考察了习惯的空间术语对非语言空间认知的影响。被试是南方和北方的大学生。结果表明,南方大学生和北方大学生在非语言的空间操作任务上所使用的参考框架存在显著差异,南方大学生更多地使用以观察者为中心的相对参考框架(前、后、左、右),北方大学生更多地使用以太阳升落和地球磁场为参照的绝对参考框架(东、西、南、北)。这种参考框架使用上的差异与他们习惯的空间术语一致。上述结果表明,习惯的空间术语对非语言空间认知有重要影响。 The study adopted the paradigm of the viewerg rotation initiated by Levinson, explored the effects of spatial expression habits on people's non-linguistic spatial cognition. The subjects were the undergraduates from both south and north China. The results showed a great difference between the south and the north that Southerners incline to use relative egocentric frame (left, right, front, back) while Northerners use absolute reference frame (east, west, north, south) as spatial reference in the same non-linguistic spatial cognitive task. The difference of reference frames is consistent with the habits of spatial expression. It suggested that spatial language habits affect non-linguistic spatial cognition.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第4期469-475,共7页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(04BYY007) 广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(XLY0304)。
关键词 习惯的空间术语 空间认知 语言关联性 spatial language habits, spatial cognition, linguistic relativity.
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Fodor J. The language of thought. New York: Crowell, 1975.
  • 2Landau B, Jackendoff R. ‘what’ and ‘ Where’ in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1993, 16:217-238.
  • 3Pinker S. The language instinct. New York: Morrow, 1994.
  • 4Sapir E, Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech, New York, 1921.
  • 5Whorf B L. Language, thought, and reality: Selected writing of Benjamin Lee Whorf. New York: Wiley, 1956.
  • 6Berlin B, Kay P. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1969.
  • 7Heider E R. Universals in color naming and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 93:10-20.
  • 8Bowerman M. The origins of children's patial semantic categories:cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In: Gumperz J and Levinson S (Eds). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press, 1996. 145 - 176.
  • 9McDonough L, Chili S, Mandler J. Development of language-specific categorization of spatial relations from pre-linguistic to linguistic stage a preliminary study. Paper presented at the Finding the Words Conference at Stanford University, Stanford, California, 2000.
  • 10Levinson S. Frames of reference and Molyneux' s quest on: cross linguistic evidence. In: P Bloom, M Peterson( Eds. ) Language and Space, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.109-169.

同被引文献214

引证文献23

二级引证文献160

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部