期刊文献+

行政诉讼法完善的几点思考 被引量:1

On the Perfection of Administrative Procedure Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于人民法院审理行政案件,“以法律、法规为依据”的规定,建议改为依据法律,适用法规;关于对行政行为的全面审查,以及在此基础上所确定的判决形式,建议摒弃全面审查,废除维持判决,对当事人的诉讼请求作出回应;关于原告范围,建议在以利害关系界定原告的前提下,进一步区分直接利害关系和间接利害关系,间接利害关系区分相同利益利害关系与相反利益利害关系;行政机关第三人地位应在区分行政权不同性质的情况下予以具体确认。 As regards to administrative cases ruled by courts, it is suggested that the stipulation of “in accordance with law and regulation ' be changed into' in accordance with law, the application of regulations”. As to the comprehensive censorship of administrative act and the verdicts based on it, it is reasonable to get rid of the comprehensive censorship, abolish the practice of verdicts of sustaining the specific administrative act and respect the claims of the plaintiff. It is proposed that the right of lodging a suit be decided by direct or indirect relationship. Whether the administrative organs can be regarded as the third party depends on the different nature of the administrative power.
作者 王军
出处 《合肥学院学报(社会科学版)》 2005年第3期123-125,135,共4页 Journal of Hefei University:Social Sciences
关键词 行政诉讼法 法的适用规则 判决形式 原告 第三人 administrative procedure law jurisdiction clause form of verdict plaintiff the third party
  • 相关文献

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部