期刊文献+

后腹腔镜辅助小切口离断式肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻 被引量:23

Retroperitoneal laparoscopy-assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty with small incision for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨后腹腔镜辅助小切口离断式肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO)的临床疗效.方法采用后腹腔镜辅助,小切口、放大镜下吻合的离断式肾盂成形术治疗UPJO患者12例.男8例,女4例.年龄5~48岁.B超及尿路造影显示UPJO伴有肾积水,其中B超提示重度肾积水4例,中度6例,轻度2例.IVU显影良好9例,显影差3例.结果12例手术均获成功.手术时间100~180 min,平均127 min;出血量30~100ml,平均70 ml;术后住院时间5~8 d,平均5.6 d;无手术并发症.术后随访3~12个月,经B超和IVU检查,UPJ吻合口无狭窄,肾积水减轻,肾功能有不同程度改善.结论后腹腔镜辅助小切口离断式肾盂成形术是治疗UPJO的较实用、微创的手术,值得临床选择应用. Objective To describe the retroperitoneal laparoscopy-assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty with small incision for the treatment of ureteropelvie junction obstruction (UPJO) and to evaluate its clinical effect. Methods Twelve cases of UPJO (8 men and 4 women;age range, 5-48 years) underwent retroperitoneal laparoseopy-assisted, small incision, dismembered pyeloplasty. Of them,4 cases had severe hydronephrosis ;6,intermediate;and 2 ,mild by B-ultrasound and urography. Nine cases had good IVU imaging and 3 had poor IVU imaging. Results All the procedures were successful. The operative time was 100 - 180 rain (mean,127 min) ;the blood loss was 30 - 100 ml(mean,70 ml) and the postoperative hospitalization was 5 -8 d (mean,5.6 d). No perioperative complication occurred. Follow-up of 3 - 12 months by intravenous urography and B-ultrasound showed no stricture at UPJ,and hydronephrosis was remitted and renal functions were improved. Conclusions Retroperitoneal laparoscopy-assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty with small incision is a feasible, minimally invasive and effective way to treat UPJO with less morbidity and shorter convalescence.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第8期532-534,共3页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻 腹腔镜术 治疗 离断式肾盂成形术 Ureteropelvic junction obstruction Laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1[1]O'Reilly P H, Brooman P J, Mak S, et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int, 2001, 87:287-289.
  • 2[2]Cohen T D, Gross M B, Preminger G M. Long-term follow-up of Acucise incision of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and ureteral stricture. Urology, 1996, 47:317-323.
  • 3[3]Danuser H, Ackermann D K, Bohlen D. Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate. J Urol, 1998, 159:56-61.
  • 4[4]Gupta M, Tuncay O L, Smith A. Open surgical exploration after failed endopyelotomy: A 12-year experience. J Urol, 1997, 157:1613-1619.
  • 5[5]Bernado N, Smith A D. Endopyelotomy review. Arch Esp Urol, 1999, 52:541-548.
  • 6[6]Turk I A, Davis J W, Winkelmann B, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty-the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol, 2002, 42:268-275.
  • 7[7]Jarrett T W, Chan D Y, Charambura T C, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol, 2002, 167:1253-1256.
  • 8[8]Eden C G, Cahill D, Allen J D. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int, 2001, 88:526-531.
  • 9[9]Soulie M, Salomon L, Patard J J, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol, 2001, 166:48-50.
  • 10[10]Ben Slama M R, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: initial experience in 15 cases. Urology, 2000, 56:45-48.

共引文献83

同被引文献102

引证文献23

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部