期刊文献+

腹腔镜与小切口胆囊切除术后患者生存质量比较 被引量:9

Laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy: Analysis of postoperative quality of life
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopiccholecystectomy,LC)与小切口胆囊切除术(mini-incisioncholecystectomy,MC)后患者生存质量的差异。方法对152例胆囊切除术后患者生存质量进行调查,其中LC组78例,MC组74例,利用美国36项健康观察概况表(SF-36)对2组患者进行评估。结果调查问卷的随访时间LC组为(24·2±3·1)周,MC组为(23·9±2·9)周。LC组和MC组术前SF-36总分平均109·3分和107·2分(t=1·571,P=0·118)。LC组术后2周时,SF-36总分为107分,下降不明显(P>0·05),术后4周以后SF-36总分、主观症状、生理功能、社会活动及心理情绪等方面均显著高于术前水平(P<0·05)。MC组术后2周时SF-36总分为100分,降幅明显(P<0·05),同时主观症状、生理功能、社会活动及心理情绪等方面分值均较术前明显下降(P<0·05),术后4周时SF-36总分为106分,恢复至术前水平(P>0·05),术后8周以后,SF-36总分、主观症状、生理功能、社会活动及心理情绪等方面均显著高于术前水平(P<0·05)。术后8周内LC组SF-36总分显著高于MC组(P<0·05)。结论LC组术后生存质量优于MC组。 Objective Tolaparoscopic or mini cholecystectomyinvestigate the postoperative quality of life (QOL) in two groups of patients treated with Methods The quality of life was evaluated in 152 patients after either laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Group LC, 78 patients) or mini cholecystectomy (Group MC, 74 patients) by using the Medical Outcomes Study 36 - Item Short - Form Health Survey ( SF - 36). Results The length of follow - up was (24. 2 + 3. 1 ) weeks in the Group LC and (23.9 +2. 9) weeks in the Group MC. The mean preoperative SF- 36 scores of all dimensions of the quality life were 109 in the Group LC and 107 in the Group MC respectively (t = 1. 571 ,P =0. 118). In the Group LC, the SF -36 score decreased insignificantly at 2 weeks after operation ( 107, P 〉 0. 05 ), whereas a significant improvement in SF - 36 score, symptomatology, and emotional and physiological status was noted at 4 weeks after operation ( P 〈 0.05 ). In the Group MC, the SF - 36 score was 100 after 2 weeks ( P 〈0. 05) with a significant drop in the aspects of symptomatology, physiological and social status ( P 〈 0. 05 ) and the SF - 36 score reached to the preoperative level of 106 after 4 weeks (P 〉 0. 05). The SF - 36 score, symptomatology, and physiological and social status of the Group MC were significantly improved 8 weeks after operation than preoperation (P 〈 0. 05). The Group LC showed a remarkably better SF - 36 score than the Group MC for up to 8 weeks postoperatively ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions The quality of life after LC is superior to that after MC.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2005年第8期644-646,共3页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜 胆囊切除术 生存质量 Laparoscopy Cholecystectomy Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1McMahon AJ,Ross S,Baxter JN,et al.Symptomatic outcome 1 year after laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy:a randomised trial.Br Surg,1995,82:1378-1382.
  • 2Jenkinson C,Coulter A,Wright J.Short form 36(SF-36)health survey questionnaire:normative data for adults of working age.BMJ,1993,306:1437-1440.
  • 3邱建平,袁建毛,吴国良.腹腔镜与小切口胆囊切除术再比较体会[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2002,7(3):139-140. 被引量:4
  • 4陈力,戴宁,施小宇,陶思丰,张文瑾.腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除手术对患者生存质量的影响[J].中华外科杂志,2002,40(10):762-765. 被引量:25
  • 5Plaisier PW, van der Hul L, Nijs T,et al.Quality of life and the course of biliary and gastrointestinal symptoms after laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy. Dig Surg, 1995, 12:87-91.
  • 6Ware JE Jr,Sherbourne CD.The MOS 36-item short form health survey(SF-36).Med Care,1992,30:473-483.
  • 7Buess GF,Klein U,Manncke K,et al.Follow up results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Chirurg,1995,66:982-989.
  • 8Stiff G,Rhodes M,Kelly A,et al.Long team pain:less common after laparoscopic than open cholecystectomy.Br J Surg,1994,81:1368-1370.

二级参考文献11

  • 1汤旦林,王松柏.生存质量测定及其在临床试验中的应用[J].中华医学杂志,1994,74(3):175-179. 被引量:86
  • 2[3]黄芺庭.腹部外科手术并发症[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002
  • 3胡三元.腹腔镜临床诊治技术[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.145.
  • 4Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg, 1995,82: 216-222.
  • 5Troidl H, Kusche J, Vesterweber KH, et al. Pouch versus esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg,1987,11: 699-712.
  • 6Kum CK, Eypasch E, Lefering R, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is it relly safe. World J Surg, 1996,20:43-49.
  • 7Troidl H, Wechsler AS, McKneally MF. How to choose a relevant endpoints. In: Troidl H, ed. Surgical research.3rd ed. New York: Springer, 1997.303-320.
  • 8Slim K, Bousquet J, Kwiatkowski F, et al. Analysis of randomized controlled trials in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg, 1997,84: 610-614.
  • 9陈力,江献川,戴宁,陈根富.肝脏手术对患者生存质量的影响[J].中国实用外科杂志,1997,17(5):268-270. 被引量:11
  • 10罗开元,林世杰,杨镛,王明春,刘文卓,和红春,钱进森.传统术式、腹腔镜与小切口胆囊切除术疗效对比研究[J].中华外科杂志,1997,35(11):660-662. 被引量:35

共引文献27

同被引文献54

引证文献9

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部