期刊文献+

线虫作为土壤健康指示生物的方法及应用 被引量:104

Nematodes as bioindicator of soil health:methods and applications
下载PDF
导出
摘要 简述了线虫作为土壤健康指示生物的优势,归纳了常用指数和分析方法,对成熟指数及基于营养类群的一些指数和分析方法进行了详细介绍.与其他指数相比,成熟指数更能敏感地反映土壤环境的受胁迫程度,基于营养类群的指数和分析方法可以在生态系统功能水平上更好地揭示土壤环境的健康状态.概述了以上指数和方法在农业、森林、草原及其他生态系统中的应用研究.结合目前存在的一些问题,提出以下建议:加强对土壤线虫生活史和食性等特性的认识;进一步完善现有指数,将多种指数和分析方法结合使用;加强土壤线虫在多种生态系统及大尺度地域空间内的应用. This paper summarized the advantages of using nematodes as soil health bioindicator. A review of commonly used indices and analyzing methods by means of nematodes was presented, with emphases on Maturity Index, as well as the indices and analyzing methods based on their trophic groups. Compared with other indices, Maturity Index can reflect the stressed degree of soil more sensitively, and the indices and analyzing methods based on their trophic groups can well reveal the state of soil health based on ecosystem functioning. The applications of nema-todes as bioindicator in agriculture, forest, grassland, and other ecosystems were also outlined. In view of some practical limitations in the methods, prospective researches and applications were suggested, i. e., intensify the ecological studies to advance the understanding on the characteristics of soil nematodes, such as their life histories and feeding habits, consummate the indication system by integrating various nematode indices and analyzing methods, and extend the applications of soil nematodes in different ecosystems and in different regions at large scales.
出处 《应用生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第8期1541-1546,共6页 Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30000020 30370285).
关键词 土壤线虫 指示生物 成熟指数 营养类群 Soil nematode, Bioindicator, Maturity Index, Trophic group.
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献62

  • 1熊炳昆.稀土生物功能化合物的应用研究[J].中国稀土学报,1994,12(4):358-365. 被引量:56
  • 2梁文举 史奕 等.农业生态系统线虫多样性研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2000,11:113-116.
  • 3青木淳一.土壤动物学[M].东京:北隆馆,1980..
  • 4[1]Augustsson KA, Rundgren S. 1998. The advantages and disadvantages of Cognettia sphagnetorum in risk evaluation. Ambio, 27(1):61~68
  • 5[2]Baer SG, Rice CW, Blair JM. 2000. Assessment of soil quality in fields with short and long term enrollment in the CRP. J Soil Water Conser,(2): 142~146
  • 6[15]Jordan D, Kremer RJ, Bergfield WA,et al. 1995. Evaluation of microbial methods as potential indicators of soil quality in historical agricultural fields.Biol Ferti Soils, 19(4):297~302
  • 7[16]Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW,et al. 1997. Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation (a guest editorial).J Soil Sci Soc Amer,61:4~10
  • 8[17]Karlen DL, Gardner JC, Rosek MJ. 1998. A soil quality framework for evaluating the impact of CRP.J Produc Agric,11(1): 56~60
  • 9[18]Kinako PDS. 1983. Assessment of relative soil quality by ecological bioassay.Afric J Ecol,21(4):291~295
  • 10[19]Lal R. 1998. Soil quality changes under continuous cropping for seventeen seasons of an alfisol in Western Nigeria.Land Degrad Develop,9(3): 259~274

共引文献628

同被引文献1498

引证文献104

二级引证文献934

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部