摘要
善意取得制度为权利的非逻辑性变动提供正当性依据,解决的核心问题是无权处分情形下的权利瑕疵,而对标的物的质量瑕疵及迟延交付等问题则无暇顾及,不足以提供充分的救济调节交易当事人之间的关系,这构成善意取得制度的明显缺陷。而无权处分人和善意受让人之间存在的有效债权契约为补救上述缺陷提供了基础,违约责任的承担就成为恰当的手段。如此,善意取得制度的缺陷即在该制度之外找到彻底解决的途径。而由于这一契约的特殊性,违约责任也表现出自己的特色。
The institution of bona fide acquisition offers a reasonable legal basis to the illogical transfer of right, giving remedies when the right is disposed under ex- right disposition, however, it ignores the problems of bad quality of goods and delayed performing of obligation, thus it can' t be applied to regulate the relationship between the parties. Such problem could be solved by the way of contract liability between the seller without right of disposal and the bona fide buyer, which requires an effective contract between them as the premise. Also, because of the particularities of the contract, the liability of the contract has it' s own characteristics.
出处
《法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第4期3-16,共14页
Chinese Journal of Law