期刊文献+

20世纪对西方占星术的科学检验 被引量:3

The Scientific Test on Western Astrology in Twentieth Century
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪,一些学者和科学家试图用已有的科学理论和哲学分析将西方占星术(astrology)①排除在科学之外,但真正让西方占星术目前仍没能走入主流科学里的,却是近30年来的几百个对占星术有效性的科学检验。今天从哲学上看,无论是证伪主义所表述的科学是理性的,还是历史主义所表述的科学是非理性的都一致地把占星术拒斥在科学之外。占星术之所以又会在大众中盛行起来,是缘于在20世纪初人们开始对科学万能发生质疑,同时对主要是涉及精神领域的占星术,至今仍没有能很好替代它的科学学科,正如化学、核物理学可以很好地替代炼金术那样。 In twentieth century, some scientists had tried excluding the astrology from science by scientific theory and philosophic method. In fact,it was hundreds of scientific tests which carried througth on astrology that stop astrology becoming a subject of science. From today' s viewpoints, whether from the named rational science, or the named irrational science, they all refuse astrology. Astrology has become popular in the world today, not only because people doubt the omnipotent science in the beginning of twentieth century, but also because people have realized that no subject can replace astrology which looks more irmnaterial, this was very different from the situation alchemy met which had been replaced by chemistry and nuclear physics well.
作者 朱彤
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第8期21-24,37,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 占星术 科学划界 科学检验 研究纲领 有效性 astrology demarcation scientific tests programmes work
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1江晓原.历史上的占星学[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,1995.2.6..
  • 2Bok Bart J, Lawrence E Jerome, Paul Kurtz. Objections to Astrology[J] .The Humanist, 1975.35(5) :4.
  • 3伊丽莎白·泰西埃 白巨译.大预测[M].北京:作家出版社,1996.30,249.
  • 4Eysenck H J.Stars and Sceptics[J] .Nature,1984(312) :219.
  • 5Martin Curd,J A Cover(eds). Philosophy of Science: the Central Issues [C] .New York:W. W. Norton & Company, 1998.29,8,17,30,31,32,73.
  • 6保罗·费耶阿本德 周昌忠 译.反对方法——无政府主义知识论纲要[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1992.266.
  • 7Dean G, I W Kelly. Does Astrology Work? Astrology and Skepticism 1975 - 2000 [ M] . New York: Prometheus Books,2001. 196 - 197.
  • 8Carlson,Shawn. A Double - blind Test of Astrology[J ].Nature, 1985(318) :419 -425.
  • 9伊·拉卡托斯.科学研究纲领方法论[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1986.204、167.
  • 10郭颖颐.中国现代思想中的唯科学主义(1900—1950)[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,1989.113.

共引文献32

同被引文献37

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部