4种抗生素治疗非淋菌性尿道(宫颈)炎的成本-效果分析

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of 4 Antibiotics in the Treatment of Nongonococcal Urethritis(Cervicitis)

目的:评价4种口服抗生素治疗非淋菌性尿道(宫颈)炎(NGU)的成本-效果。方法:收集口服国产阿奇霉素与司帕沙星、进口阿奇霉素与司帕沙星治疗NGU的临床资料,进行成本-效果分析。结果:国产阿奇霉素与司帕沙星、进口阿奇霉素与司帕沙星治疗NGU的治愈率分别为89.6%与83.2%、95.5%与88.3%;成本-效果比分别为39与139、140与220。结论:国产与进口阿奇霉素、国产与进口司帕沙星均能有效治疗NGU,但国产阿奇霉素的成本-效果优于国产司帕沙星,进口阿奇霉素的成本-效果亦优于进口司帕沙星。

OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the cost- effectiveness of 4 oral antibiotics in the treatment of nongonococcal urethritis （cervicitis）（NGU）.METHODS：The clinical data on both the homemade and imported oral azithromycin and sparfloxacin in the treatment of NGU were collected and the cost effectiveness analyses of which were conducted. RESULTS： The cure rates of the homemade azithromycin and sparfloxacin and the imported azithromycin and sparfloxacin were 89.6% and 83.2%, 95.5% and 88.3%, respectively. The cost- effectiveness ratios of which were 39 and 139, 140 and 220, respectively。CONCLUSION： Both the homemade and the imported azithromycin and sparfloxacin can effectively treat NGU but the cost effectiveness of the homemade azithromycin is superior the homemade sparfloxacin, and that of the imported azithromycin is superior to the imported sparfloxacin as well。