4Falagas M E, Pitsouni E I, Malietzis G A, et al. Comparison ofPubMed,Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengthsand weaknesses [ J ]. The FASEB Journal,2008, 22 ( 2 ) ; 338 -342.
5Meho L I, Yang Kiduk. Impact of data sources on citation countsand rankings of LIS faculty : Web of Science versus Scopus andGoogle Scholar[ J ]. Journal of the American Society for InformationScience and Technology ,2007 ,58( 13) :2105 -2125.
6Adriaanse L S, Rensleigh C. Web of Science,Scopus and GoogleScholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison [ J]. The Elec-tronic Library ,2013 ,31(6) :727 -744.
7Jacso P. Testing the calculation of a realistic h - index in GoogleScholar,Scopus, and Web of Science for FW Lancaster [ J ]. LibraryTrends,2008,56(4) :784 -815.
8Zarifmahmoudi L, Kianifar H R, Sadeghi R. Citation analysis of Ira-nian journal of basic medical sciences in ISI Web of Knowledge,Scopus, and Google Scholar [ J ]. Iranian Journal of Basic MedicalSciences,2013,16( 10) : 1027 -1030.
9De Groote S L, Raszewski R. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus,and Web of Science: A case study of the h-index in nursing[ J].Nursing Outlook, 2012,60 (6) :391 -400.
10Jacso P. Deflated,inflated and phantom citation counts[ J]. OnlineInformation Review,2006,30(3) :297 -309.
