摘要
对16例心房扑动(简称房扑)患者,8例采用局部电位标测法,8例采用影象定位法进行射频消融。12例普通型房扑全部消融成功,4例合并非普通型房扑者1例消融成功。局部电位标测法(消融成功5例)平均放电11.8±4.4次、手术时间228.4±6.6min、X线照射时间60.8±10.1min;影象定位法(消融成功8例)依次平均为5.3±6.2次、122.5±26.8min、29.8±11.1min,与前一种方法比较均有显著性差异,P值分别<0.05,0.005,0.001。提示后种方法优于前种方法。随访45.5±25.5周,3例复发。
Eight consecutive patients with atrial flutter underwent right atrial endocardial activation mapping and the area of slow conduction and the exit site or site near the exit from the area of slow conduction were ablated using radiofrequency(RF)energy in them.Another eight patients underwent ablation of the isthmus between the in terior vena cava and the tricuspid valve under guidance of fluoroscopy.Upon identifying appropriate sites,RF(2540 W)was applied via a 4 mm tipped catheter,and RF was effective in terminating and preventing reinduction of a trial flutter in l2 patients with common type of atrial flutter and one patient with uncommon type of trial flutter.In three patients accompanied with uncommon type of atrial flutter,tachycardia was not terminated.Applications of RF energy,procedure time and fluoroscopic time were 11.8±4.4 times,228.4±6.6 min,60.8±10.1 min and 5.3±6.2 times(P<0.05),122.5±26.8 min(P<0.005),29.8±1.1 min(P<0.001)respectively in the first and second groups.Follow-up(mean 45.5±25.5 weeks)revealed recurrence of atrial flutter in 3 patients.
关键词
心房扑动
射频消融
电位标测
影像定位
Atrial flutter Catheter ablation,radiofrequency current Activation mapping Anatomic marker guidance