期刊文献+

离差法筛查营养不良实用性的探讨 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以2,250名2~6岁儿童为对象,用综合评价法对离差法筛查营养不良的实用性进行了对比分析。结果显示:离差法按年龄别体重(W/A)诊断营养不良误诊率高达63.3%,漏诊率为38.1%。不利于早防早治,离差法按身离别体重(W/H)评价,营养不良误诊率为36.1%。离差法对个体指导有一定的意义,但不宜作群体评价。群体评价应采用综合法比较实用。
出处 《中国学校卫生》 CAS 北大核心 1995年第5期387-388,共2页 Chinese Journal of School Health
  • 相关文献

同被引文献28

  • 1孙曼英,张育武.用离差法筛查营养不良效果评价[J].中国妇幼保健,1993,8(6):43-44. 被引量:2
  • 2季成叶.中国青少年健康相关/危险行为调查综合报告2005[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.
  • 3DON N. Health literacy as a public health goal:A challenge for con- temporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century[ J]. Health Promotion International ,2000,15 ( 3 ) :259-267.
  • 4ANDREW P, SHYAMA K. A tale of two health literacies: Public health and clinical approaches to health literacy [ J ]. Health Promo- tion International ,2008,23 ( 2 ) : 152- 159.
  • 5KONDILIS BK, SOTERIADES ES, FALAGAS ME. Health literacy research in Europe: A snapshot [ J ]. Eur J Public Health , 2006,16 (1) :113.
  • 6ROOTMAN I, GORDON-EL-BIHBETY. Vision for a Health Literate Canada: Report of the Expert Panel on Health Literacy[ R]. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Public Health Association,2008.
  • 7US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010 : understanding and improving health [ M ]. Washington DC : US Gov- ernment Printing Office,2000.
  • 8WHO division of health promotion, education and communications. Health education and health promotion unit [ M ]. Geneva:Health pro- motion glossary, 1998.
  • 9中华人民共和国卫生部.首次中国居民健康素养调查报告[EB/OL].[2009-12-01].http://www.moh.gov.cn/publicfiles///business/cmsresources/wsb/cmsrsdocument/doc6875.pdf.
  • 10PARKER RM, RATZAN SC, LURIE N. Health literacy: A policy challenge for advancing high-quality health care [ J ]. Health- Aft (Millwood) ,2003,22(4) : 147-153.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部