摘要
二轴晶光率体光性正负有两种判别方法:一种是根据光轴角(2V)的锐角平分线(Bxa)与Ng一致还是与Np一致来判别,其临界点是2y=90°;另一种是根据三个主拆射率的相对大小来判别.由于二轴晶光率体为三轴椭球体,在其临界点Ng一Nm=Nm一Np时,光轴角并不等于90°。就是说,两种判别方法的临界点不一致。本文从光率体几何特性研究入手,通过几何及数学方法,着重讨论上述两种判别方法在其临界点时的相对关系,并结合实际例证,认为二轴晶光率体光性正负的临界点不能只确定为一个点,而应限定在一个范围,即2V=90°到Ng-Nm=Nm-Np之间。
There are two methods to identify optic sign of biaxial indicatrix. One is based on whether the bisector of the acute angle is parallel with Ng (positi-ve) or with Np(negative), with the critical angle 2V being 90°; the other is based on the comparison of three principal refractive indexes:when Ng-Nm>Nm- Np, the optic sign is positive; when Ng-Nm<Nm-Np,the sign is negative. It is generally held that the critical point for the two methods is identical,i.e,when Ng-Nm=Nm-Np , the optic angle is 90°. Nevertheless, the author considers that the critical points of the two methods are not consistent with each other in that the biaxial indicatrix is a tria一xial ellipsoid. The paper deals emphatically with the relationship between the methods at the critical point in terms of geometrical property of the opti-cal indicatrix and mathematic analysis, and holds that, instead of being a fixed point, the critical point for determining the optic sign of the biaxial indicatrix varies in a range from a point at which the acute optical angle 90°to the point at which Ng- Nm equals Nm-Np.
出处
《岩石矿物学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
1995年第4期371-378,共8页
Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica