期刊文献+

氨氯地平与硝苯地平治疗高血压的临床研究 被引量:16

Clinical Study of Amlodipine Versus Nifedipine Treatment of Essential Hypertension
原文传递
导出
摘要 比较在轻度至中度高血压中用氨氯地平及硝苯地平治疗4周的疗效与安全性,结果显示氨氯地平降压作用缓慢而持久,早期血管性不良反应较少。无停药后高血压性反跳效应,不影响神经内分泌系统。 Responsive rate and safety of amlodipine andnifedipine were compared in patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension. The results showed that the antihypertensive actions of amlodipine were slow and long lasting. Itsadverse effects related to vasodilation were fewer than those ofnifedipine. No hypertension rebound effects was found whendrug is suddenly stopped and no neuroendocrine adverse effectwas found. It is suggested that amlodipine is not only a safe.effective,but also a promising antihypertensive agent.
出处 《中国高血压杂志》 CSCD 1995年第1期63-65,共3页
关键词 氨氯地平 硝苯地平 高血压 治疗 药物疗法 amlodipine nifedipine essential hypertension
  • 相关文献

同被引文献51

引证文献16

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部