摘要
将66例二尖瓣狭窄患者首次行PBMV和18例外科分离术后再狭窄患者行PBMV进行比较,结果表明两者扩瓣治疗前、后的血流动力学指数有明显差异(P<0.001),但将两者术后相应的血流动力学指数进行比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)。说明外科二狭分离术后再狭窄患者成功地进行PBMV可显著改善临床症状,仍是一种有效的方法。
Comparing 64 cases of mitral valvuloplasty done PBMV opertion first with 18 cases of restenosis after mitral valvotomy. We found that each of both had significant difference (P<0.001) in hemodynamic between pre and post operation ; But they had no significant difference (P>0. 05) between their post operation. The results show that doing PBMV operation for restenosis after mitral valvotomy is an effective method.
出处
《中国介入心脏病学杂志》
1995年第3期107-108,共2页
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology