摘要
100例老年高血压患者随机分为两组,尼卡的平组(30~60mg/日)50例,开搏通组(25~50mg/日)50例,疗程4周。结果示二者在改善老年高血压的生活质量及降压疗效相似,但尼卡的平价格更便宜,有更好的价效关系。
lthough the precise cause of hypertension is notknown,empire treatment indicated
to reduce cardio-cere-brovascular risk.Several pharmacologic classes of anti-hyper-tensive
drugs are available to reduce the blood pressure, butthey may have different cost
effectiveness,The therapeutic goal in aged hypertension is not only to normalize blood pres-
sure but also to improve quality of life and get good cost effec- tiveness。In this study we
compared the cost-utility of Nicadip- ine therapy (30~60mg/day),a calcium antagonist,with
capoten(25 ~ 50mg/day )。There were 50 patients in each group who were randonized.The
results showed that Nicadip- ine therapy was more effective in the anti-hypertensive action
than Capoten and in improvement of quality of life was similar to it.Nicadipine which was made
in China one was cheaper than Capoten。Thus,it had better cost-utility relation。It was
concluded that both Nicadipine and Capoten were able to im- prove quality of life but they
cause different cost-utility rela- tion in aged hypertensive。
出处
《中国慢性病预防与控制》
CAS
1995年第6期267-269,共3页
Chinese Journal of Prevention and Control of Chronic Diseases
关键词
高血压
老年人
价效关系
开搏通
尼卡的平
Aged hypertensive
Cost-utility Cost-effective as- sessment Quality of life