期刊文献+

应用干湿疗法治疗烧伤67例临床对比观察 被引量:1

Clinical Comparison Between the Efficacy of MEBT and Conventional Dry Therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过我院1989~1991年与1992年两组烧伤住院病人采用不同治疗方法的对比观察中发现,MEBT比传统治疗方法有诸多优越性:1.明显提高治愈率,在医疗条件简陋的边远地区,该法仍不失为一种实用有效的好方法。2.明显减少烧伤后遗症的发生。3.对面部浅Ⅱ°烧伤愈后有美容效果。 In the period from 1989 to 1991, burn patientswere treated in our hospital with conventional drytherapy and after 1992, patients were treated withMEBT. A comparison between the efficacy of the twomethods revealed that MEBT is superior to conventional dry therapy in many aspects: Firstly, the healing rate was increased obviously. In remote and ruralareas where modern medical facilities are stilI Iack-ing, MEBT can be widely accepted as a practical andeffective means for treating burns. Secondly, MEBTreduced the occurrence of sequel of burns and thirdly,MEBT had aesthetic effect in treating superficial second degree burns in face.
作者 杨跃超
出处 《中国烧伤创疡杂志》 1995年第1期37-38,60,共2页 The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献195

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部