期刊文献+

类别学习的机制:基于类别中心学习假设的解释 被引量:1

Category Learning:Explanation based on CCL Hypothesis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了区分推理学习是学习类别内部结构还是学习类别对应特征的规则,该研究使用眼动仪研究了22名大学生被试在类别学习过程中的眼动情况。被试被随机分为相等的两组,一组进行分类学习,另一组进行推理学习。实验分为学习、测试两阶段,在学习阶段被试三个连续单元的正确率为90%或者30个单元做完则结束学习,在测试阶段检验学习的效果。结果表明推理学习者在学习过程中关注的是类别内部特征之间的关系,而不是类别对应特征的规则。 In order to distinguish people learn category is by learning of within-category information or by learning a set of category-to-feature rules in inference learning,Eyelink-II was used to research 22 undergraduates' eye fixation in category learning.Participants were assigned randomly and in equal numbers to inference learning or classification learning.The experiment has a learning phase followed by a test phase.In the learning phase all participants keep learning until they reached a learning criterion of 90% accuracy on three consecutive blocks,or until 30 blocks finished.The results showed that inference learner fixated relations among within-category features,rather than category-to-feature rules.
作者 邢强 车敬上
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2010年第6期54-57,共4页 Psychological Exploration
基金 国家自然科学基金(31070918) 广州市人文社会科学发展与教育心理学重点研究基地成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献34

  • 1刘志雅,莫雷.类别学习中两种学习模式的比较研究:分类学习与推理学习[J].心理学报,2006,38(6):824-832. 被引量:8
  • 2Anderson J. The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 1991, 98(3): 629- 647.
  • 3Gelman S, Markman E M. Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 1986, 23(3): 183-209.
  • 4Davidson N, Gelman S, Inductions from novel categories: The role of language and conceptual structure. Cognitive Development, 1990, 5 (2): 151 - 176.
  • 5Yamauchi T, Markman A B. Category learning by inference and classification. Journal of Memory and Language, 1998, 39(1): 124- 148.
  • 6Yamauchi T, Love B, Markman A B. Learning nonlinearly separable categories by inference and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2002, 28(3): 585- 593.
  • 7Jane E E, Chin-Parker R B. Inference and classification learning of abstract coherent categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005, 31(1 ): 86- 89.
  • 8Yamauchi T, Markman A B. Learning categories composed of varying instances: the effect of classification, inference, and structural alignment. Memory & Cognition, 2000b, 28(1): 64- 78.
  • 9Anderson A, Ross B, Chin-Parker S. A further investication of category learning by inference. Memory &Cognition, 2002, 30( 1 ): 119 - 128.
  • 10Arthur B, Markman A B, Ross B. Category use and category Learning. Psychological Bulletin, 2003, 129(4): 592 - 613.

共引文献1

同被引文献22

  • 1刘志雅,莫雷.类别学习中的分类和推理[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):774-783. 被引量:5
  • 2胡北忠.基于旅游者的旅游风景区品牌价值评估[J].江西财经大学学报,2005(2):59-61. 被引量:20
  • 3尤晨,陈传明.关于服装专业市场品牌化发展的思考[J].现代管理科学,2006(4):9-10. 被引量:6
  • 4邱浩政,林碧芳.结构方程模型的原理与应用[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2009.
  • 5Woodruff, R. B., Gardial, S. F.. Know Your Customer: New Approaches to Customer Value and Satisfaction[J]. Cambridge,MA: Blackwell, 1996.
  • 6Rajiv Vaidyanathan, Praveen Aggarwal. Strategic Brand Alliances:Implications of Ingredient Branding for National and Private Label Brands[J]. Journal of Product&Brand Management, 2000, (4): 214-228.
  • 7Anderson J. The Adaptive Nature of Human Categorization[J]. Psychological Review, 1991, (98): 409-429.
  • 8Markman A, Ross B.. Category Use and Category Learning[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2003, 129(4): 592-613.
  • 9Ingo Rentschler, Martin Juttner. Dynamics and Context Dependence of Visual Category Learning[J]. Spatial Vision, 2000, 13(2-3).
  • 10Yamauchi T, Markman A.. Category Learning by Inference and Classification[J]. Journal of Memory and language, 1998, (39): 124-149.

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部