期刊文献+

雷帕霉素和紫杉醇药物洗脱支架治疗冠心病复杂病变的临床近远期疗效比较 被引量:11

Short and long-term therapeutic effects of rapamycin-eluting stent and paclitaxel-eluting stent in treatment of coronary disease with complicated lesions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较雷帕霉素(CYPHER)和紫杉醇(TAXUS)药物洗脱支架(DES)在冠心病复杂病变中的临床近、远期疗效。方法本研究选自2002年4月至2004年6月接受雷帕霉素和紫杉醇DES治疗的冠心病患者分别611例(642处病变,共置入698个雷帕霉素支架)和450例(534处病变,共置入600个紫杉醇支架),复杂病变的种类包括长段弥漫性狭窄、慢性完全闭塞性病变、分叉病变、支架内再狭窄,以及冠状动脉开口病变和左冠状动脉主干病变。结果雷帕霉素和紫杉醇DES置入成功率分别为99.2%(606/611)和98.8%(445/450),住院期间心脏事件[死亡、急性心肌梗死、靶病变血管重建,主要不良心脏事件(MACE)]发生率分别为0.65%和1.30%(P>0.05),6~8个月随访率分别为97.5%(596/611)和96.2%(433/450),随访期间MACE发生率分别为2.3%和3.2%(P>0.05),再狭窄发生率分别为7.3%和14.0%(P>0.05),血栓形成发生率分别为0.49%和0.89%(P>0.05)。结论对于冠心病复杂性病变,雷帕霉素和紫杉醇DES均有良好的临床近、远期疗效,在再狭窄发生率方面雷帕霉素支架优于紫杉醇支架。 Objective To compare the short and long-term clinical outcomes of rapamycin (sirolimus)-eluting stent (DES) (CYPHER stent ) and paclitaxel-DES (TAXUS stent ) in treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with complicated lesions. Methods 611 CHD patients with 642 lesions, were treated with 698 CYPHER stents, and 450 sex, age, clinical data and lesion type-matched patients, with 534 lesions, were treated with 600 TAXUS stents by means of percutaneous coronary intervention. The short and long term outcomes were compared between these 2 groups. Results The success rate of stent implantation was 99.2% (606/611) and 98.8% (445/450) in the CYPHER stent and TAXUS stent groups respectfully. The overall rate of major cardiac events, including death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major adverse cardiac event (MACE), during hospitalization and 6-8 month' follow-up were 0. 65% and 2. 3% in the CYPHER stent group, not significantly different from those of the TAXUS stent group ( 1.3% and 3. 2% respectively). The restenosis rate of the TAXUS stent group was 7.3%, a little higher than that of the CYPHER stent group ( 14% ), but without significant difference. Conclusion CYPHER and TAXUS DES are both safe and effective in CHD patients with complicated lesions. There is an increasing tendency of restenosis rate in the TAXUS stent group in comparison with the CYPHER stent.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第31期2183-2186,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 雷帕霉素 紫杉醇 药物洗脱支架 治疗 冠心病 疗效比较 Coronary disease Stents Cardiac events
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Schampaert E, Cohen EA, Schluter M, et al. The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long denovo lesion in small native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS). J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 43:1110-1115.
  • 2Schofer J, Schiuter M, Gershliek AH, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind, randomized controlled trial (E-SIRIUS). Lancet, 2003, 362:1860-1863.
  • 3Tanabe K , Serruys PW, Grube E, et al. TAXUS Ⅲ Trial: in-stent restenosis treated with stent based delivery of paclitaxel in corporatedin a slow-release polymer formulation. Circulation, 2003, 107 :559-564.
  • 4Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid A, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of in-stent restenosis : a quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound siudy.Circulation, 2003, 107:24-27.
  • 5Grube E, Silber S, Hauptmann KE, et al. TAXUS I : Six-and twelve-months results from a randomized double-blind trial on a slowrelease paclitaxel-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions.Circulation, 2003, 107:38-42.
  • 6Colombo A, Drzewieeki J, Banning A, et al. Randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary artery lesions. Circulation,2003, 108:7888-7894.
  • 7Lemos PA, Serruys PW, van Domburg RT, et al. Unrestricted utilization of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with conventional bare stent implantation in the“ real world” : the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry.Circulation, 2004, 109:190-193.
  • 8Tanabe K, Serruys PW, Degertekin M, et al. Chronic arterial responses to polymer-controlled paelitaxel-eluting stents: comparison with bare metal stents by serial intravaseular ultrasound analyses: data from the randomized TAXUS-II trial. Circulation, 2004, 109:196-200.
  • 9Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al. One-year clinical results with the slow-release polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent. The TAXUS-IV trial. Circulation, 2004, 109 : 1942-1947.
  • 10Holmes DR Jr, Leon MB, Moses JW, et al. Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restonsis. Circulation, 2004, 109:634-640.

同被引文献158

引证文献11

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部