摘要
在司法领域中,由于公序良俗原则的适用没有明确的判断标准,所以往往出现相同的案件、不同的判决的尴尬局面。文章对比分析了泸州遗赠案、杭州遗赠案,均得出支持法院判决的结论,并且文章通过透视遗赠案希望有助于探寻公序良俗原则适用时的具体判断标准,缓解涉及公序良俗原则案件的不稳定性,维护法律的权威与尊严。
In the judicial field,because there is no clear criterion in the principle of public order and good customs,different judgments for the same case so often happen.By comparative analysis of Luzhou bequest case and Hangzhou bequest case,the authors support the court's conclusion,and through the perspective of legacy case they hope to explore the specific criteria applicable to the principles of public order and good customs,ease the instability involved in the case of the public order and good customs principles,and maintain the authority and dignity of the law.
出处
《天津法学》
2012年第1期20-28,共9页
Tianjin Legal Science
关键词
公序良俗原则
社会秩序
善良风俗
principles of public order and good customs
social order
good customs