期刊文献+

市场失效与规划失效 被引量:6

Market Failure and Planning Failure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 微观经济学的市场边际原则被证明能够有效地指导稀缺资源的有效利用和分配,使资源效率达到最佳。市场边际原则也被应用来广泛地指导城市发展。然而,城市土地开发商和私有经营者追求的是自身利润最大化,当他们决定在哪里建什么(或做什么)时,很少考虑他们的决定对城市其他经济活动所带来的负面影响。本文阐述城市土地利用中的市场失效,讨论城市规划的本质和内容,总结城市规划失效,以及如何做好城市规划从而使城市规划与市场原则共同指导城市发展。 Marginal principle in which price should be set at the point where marginal benefit equals marginal cost yields efficiency in resources uses and allocations. This principle should be widely used to guide urban development. However, urban developers and private entrepreneurs seek to maximize profits. They seldom consider potential negative impacts of their activities on others. The rationale of urban planning in the context of market forces is derived from market failure in urban land use and land development. This paper illustrates market failure in urban land use and discusses the nature and contents of urban planning. It also summarizes from international experiences planning failure what planners should do to make planning work hand by hand with market forces.
作者 丁成日
出处 《国外城市规划》 2005年第4期1-6,共6页 Urban Planning Overseas
关键词 市场失效 规划失效 土地利用 城市规划 市场原则 Market Principles Urban Structure Efficiency in Urban Resource Allocation Market Failure Planning Failure
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1丁成日.空间结构与城市竞争力[J].地理学报,2004,59(z1):85-92. 被引量:38
  • 2Cartee, C. P. A Review of Sanitary Landfill Impacts on Property Values. The Real Estate Appraiser and Analyst, Spring 1989, 43-46.
  • 3Dotzour. M. Groundwater Contamination and Residential Property Values. Appraisal Journal, 1997.65:3,261-266.
  • 4Nelson, A. C., J. Genereux and M. Genereux. Price Effects of Landfills on House Values. Land Economics, 1993, 68:4, 359-65.
  • 5Pettit. C. L. and C. Johnson. The Impacts on Property Values of Solid Waste Facilities. Waste Age. April 1987, 97-104.
  • 6Ridker. R. G. and J. A. Henning. The Determinants of Residential Property Values with Special Reference to Air Pollution. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1967, 246-57.

二级参考文献10

  • 1[1]Ding Chengri. Managing urban growth for efficiency in infrastructure provision: dynamic capital expansion and urban growth boundary models. Ph.D. Dissertation, 1996.
  • 2[2]Mills E S. An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. American Economic Review, 1967, 57:197-210.
  • 3[3]Muth R F. Cities and Housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
  • 4[4]Alonso W. Location and Land Use. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.
  • 5[5]Brueckner Jan. The structure of urban equilibria: a unified treatment of the Muth-Mills Model. In: E S Mills (ed.),Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. Ⅱ. Elsevier Science Publisher B V, 1987.
  • 6[8]Haruya Hiroka. The development of Tokyo's rail network. Japan Railway & Transport Review, 2000, 23, March.
  • 7[9]Papageorgiou Yorgos, David Pines. An Essay on Urban Economic Theory. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
  • 8[10]Bertaud Alain. Metropolitan Structures around the world: What is common? What is difference? What is relevance to Marikina in the context of Metro Manila? Presentation in Marikina, 2003.
  • 9[11]Cervero Robert, Kang-Li Wu. Sub-centering and commuting: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area, 1980-1990.Urban Studies, 1998, 35(7): 1059-1076.
  • 10[12]McMillen Daniel P. Employment Subcenters in Chicago: Past, Present, and Future Economic Perspectives. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 2003.

共引文献37

同被引文献62

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部