走出误区的“第三条道路”:“跨国经济法”范式

The Third Route out of Wrong Cognition:Paradigm of Transnational Economic Law

在中国学界,素有“大小国际经济法”之争。因为在语境上存在着相当程度的错位现象,两派交锋多少带有“虚假”争议的成分。而“跨国经济法”范式的确立,为两派进一步靠拢树立了一条中间标杆。该范式的要义是,从区分“法律部门”和“法学学科”的原理出发,认定作为一个法律部门之“广义国际经济法”并不存在,但以“国际经济法律制度”为研究对象,完全可以形成一个“广义国际经济法学”之法学学科。依“跨国经济法”范式引入该“第三条道路”,并非基于主观上中庸之道的考量,而是全球化趋势与现行“威斯特伐利亚体系”的张力客观使然。同时,“跨国经济法”范式的确立,也有助于消除对成立一个“广义国际经济法学”学科存在的各种疑虑。

In China, there exist two different opinions on the scope of international economic law ： extensive or narrow perspective. However, the two schools does not always own the same context of the concept of international economic law, therefore, it is a ‘false＇ debate between them in some degree. This article mainly wishes to pull both extensive and narrow perspectives close to ‘the middle road＇——the paradigm of transnational economic law. The core meaning of this paradigm is that when we refuse an‘extensive system of international economic law＇, we should recognize a ‘extensive discipline of international economic law＇ which regards the international economic regime as its subject. This article firmly advocates the paradigm of transnational economic law, just for taking into account of the situation of the extension between the trend of globalization and the Westphalia System rather than the doctrine of the mean. Finally, the paradigm of transnational economic law will be helpful to release some misgivings about introduction of an ‘extensive discipline of international economic law＇.