期刊文献+

测谎问题中的“情绪成分”对皮肤电反应的影响 被引量:9

The Effect of Emotionality in Lie- detection Questions on Skin Conductance Response
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨测谎中个体情绪状态与皮肤电反应之间的关系,为改进测谎技术提供依据。方法:以38名大学生作为被试,以不同情绪激起程度的不良行为为素材进行测谎测试。结果:不同条件下被试皮肤电反应差异显著,其中高情绪激起问题和相关问题上的皮肤电反应更为强烈。结论:在一定的情景压力下,个体的情绪状态可以直接影响皮肤电活动;高情绪激起问题在鉴别说谎与诚实上,更加有效;除了说谎因素,测谎中测题本身所指向的事件就可以直接引起被试的情绪反应,从而产生皮肤电反应差异;当情景线索明确时,特定的目标事件更容易引起被试的关注,产生特殊的皮肤电反应。 Objective: to examine the relationship between emotional states and skin conductance response during lie-detection and to provide evidence for improvement of lie-detection technique. Methods: 38 university students participated in the study. They were provided with antisocial behavior materials that elicited different levels of emotional arousal. Results: Significant difference in skin conductance response was observed with the high emotionality items eliciting the highest skin conductance response. Conclusion: Under a certain level of pressure, individuals' emotional state has direct impact on skin conductance. High emotionality questions are better for detecting lies and honesty than low emotionality questions. In addition to lying, the questions themselves have direct impact on subjects' emotional responses, which in turn lead to skin conductance response. When cues for emotionality are obvious, related events tend to receive greater attention by subjects and thus lead to special skin conductance response.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 2005年第3期321-323,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 浙江省自然科学基金(项目号:302039)
关键词 测谎 不良行为 皮肤电反应 情绪 Lie detecton Behavior out of line EDA Emotion
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1傅根跃,陈昌凯.传统测谎技术研究现状与趋势[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(1):108-115. 被引量:18
  • 2傅根跃,马艳,缪伟.犯罪知识测试(GKT)测谎模式及其变式的实验研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(4):410-413. 被引量:8
  • 3G. Ben-Sharkhar and J. J. Furedy, Theories and applications in the detection of deception: A psychophysiological and international perspective, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
  • 4Bashore TR, Rapp PE.Are There Alternatives to Traditional Polygraph Procedures? Psychological Bulletin,1993,113(1) :3 -22.
  • 5Gale,Anthony (E).The polygraph test:Lies,truth and science. Newbury Park, London, England UK: Sage Publications, 1988.

二级参考文献20

  • 1[1]Lykken DT. The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1959, 43:385-388
  • 2[2]Ben-Sharkhar G,Furedy JJ. Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception: A Psychophysiological and International Perspective, New York: Springer-Verlag,1990
  • 3[3]Ben-Sharkhar G,Elaad E. The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the guilty knowledge test: A Meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88: 131-151
  • 4[4]Lykken DT. Psychology and the lie detector industry. American Psychologist,1974,29:725-739
  • 5蒋文平.走近测谎仪:我国犯罪心理测试技术与应用写真[J].心理世界,1999,(4):4-9.
  • 6王补.测谎技术在我国的应用[J].法制心理研究,1993,(4):51-55.
  • 7Horowitz S W,Kircher J C,Honts C R, Raskin D C.The role of comparison questions in physiological detection of deception.Psychophysiology,1997,34:108~11
  • 8Bashore T R, Rapp P E.Are There Alternatives to Traditional Polygraph Procedures?Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 113: 3~22
  • 9Gudjonsson G H. How to defeat the polygraphy tests. In: A Gale ed. The polygraph test: Lies, truth and science. Newbury Park: CA: Sage, 1988. 126~136
  • 10戴忠恒.心理与教育测量.1987年版.上海:华东师范大学出版社,1991.33-37

共引文献23

同被引文献113

引证文献9

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部