期刊文献+

大学英语四、六级计算机口语测试效度、信度和可操作性研究 被引量:123

Study of the validity, reliability and practicality of the computer-based oral proficiency test in CET
原文传递
导出
摘要 不久前,四、六级考试委员会正式出台了《全国大学英语四、六级考试改革方案(试行)》,明确提出“考委会将积极研究开发计算机口语测试,以进一步扩大口语考试规模”。本文通过计算机口语考试和目前的面试型口语考试的对比研究,发现考生在这两个考试中的成绩相关达到0.7058,97.80%的考生得到的成绩等级完全一致或只差半级。更重要的是,通过分析和对比研究,发现计算机考试无论在效度和信度方面都将超过目前四、六级面试型口试;在考试成本上也有较大的降低。文章对如何实行大规模口语考试提出了建议。 The reform of the present face-to-face CET Spoken English Test has now been put on the agenda of the CET committee, because, administered on a rather smaller scale due to the limited number of examiners and insufficient fund, it fails to meet the demand of the increasing number of candidates. The way out is to develop the computer-based oral proficiency test. The comparative study of the two tests is carried out in terms of validity, reliability and practicality. It shows that COPT is a successful surrogate for the CET-SET. Statistical evidence is quite encouraging: the correlation of the two tests are 0. 7058 and their rates in 97. 80% of the occasions either completely agree with each other or deviate by only haft a grade. Most important, the analysis proves the higher validity and reliability of COPT and its lower cost.
作者 蔡基刚
出处 《外语界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第4期66-75,共10页 Foreign Language World
基金 教育部大学英语教学改革扩展项目。
关键词 计算机口语考试 效度 信度 可操作性 computer-based oral proficiency test validity reliability practicality
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1邹申.试论口语测试的真实性[J].外语界,2001(3):74-78. 被引量:80
  • 2考委会.全国大学英语四、六级考试改革方案(试行).大学外语教学通讯,2005,(1).
  • 3金艳,郭杰克.大学英语四、六级考试非面试型口语考试效度研究[J].外语界,2002(5):72-79. 被引量:96
  • 4张尧学.在教育部大学英语四、六级考试改革新闻发布会上答记者问[Z].,2005..
  • 5Bac.hman L and Palmer A. Language Testing in Practice[M]. Oxford University Press, 1996.
  • 6Clark J L. Theoretical and technical considerations in oral proficiency test [A]. In Randall L J, Spolsky B( Ed. ). Testing Language Proficiency[C]. Virginia: Centre for Applied Linguistics, 1975.
  • 7Howard F. Testing communicative proficiency in French as a second language: A search for procedures [ J ].Canadian Modern Language Review, 1980, 36.
  • 8Henning G. A Guide to Language Testing - Development Evaluation Research [ M ]. Cambridge: Newbury House Publishers, 1987.
  • 9Hughes A. Testing for Language Teachers[ M]. Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  • 10jeong T. Contextualized Multimedia-Enhanced Foreign Language Speaking Test[ Z]. Presented on the 7th Academic Forum on English Language Testing in Asia, 2004.

二级参考文献4

  • 1Stansfield C W and D M Kenyon.Research on the comparability of the oral proficiency interview and the simulated oral proficiency interview[].System.1992
  • 2Shohamy E,Gordon C,Kenyon D,and Stansfield C.The development and validation of a semi-direct test for assessing oral proficiency in Hebrew[].Bulletin ofHigher Hebrew Education.1989
  • 3Shohamy E.The validity of direct versus semi-direct oral tests[].Language Testing.1994
  • 4Stansfield C W and D M Kenyon.The development and validation of a simulated oral proficiency interview[].The Modern Language Journal.1992

共引文献163

同被引文献853

引证文献123

二级引证文献333

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部