摘要
英美法系的提出证据责任、说服责任和大陆法系的主观证明责任、客观证明责任,严格来说,存在区别不能简单等同。比较而言,前者更利于描述证明责任在诉讼程序中的运作状态。应以英美法系的证明责任分层理论为分析工具,比较刑事被告人证明责任在英美法系国家、大陆法系国家及日本的运行进程,以期对我国的刑事被告人证明责任有所借鉴。
Burden of producing evidence and burden of persuasion in the Anglo-American law system and subjective burden and objective burden are different, strictly speaking. Costively, the former is better to describe the situation of burden of proof in the procedure, This thesis tries to analyze burden of proof of the accused in the counties in the Anglo-American law system and in the Continental law system and in Japan, with the theoretical tool of the theory on burden of proof in the Anglo- American law system. And it briefly introduces the state in China at present and provides the necessary reference in this aspect.
出处
《当代法学》
北大核心
2005年第5期141-148,共8页
Contemporary Law Review
基金
国家社会科学基金项目:刑事诉讼证明基本范畴研究(04CFX017)。
关键词
刑事被告人
证明责任
提供证据责任
说服责任
the accused
burden of proof
burden of producing evidence
burden of persuasion