期刊文献+

五种血清肿瘤标志物单个或联合检测在肺癌诊断中作用的初步评价 被引量:16

A preliminary evaluation of diagnostic value of five serum tumor markers for lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的初步评价细胞角蛋白19的片段(Cyfra21-1)等5种肿瘤标志物单个或联合检测在肺癌诊断,尤其是早期诊断中的作用。方法采用电化学发光免疫法检测了124例肺癌和41例非肿瘤肺病患者血清中Cyfra21-1、癌胚抗原(CEA)、神经元烯醇化酶(NSE)、糖链抗原19-9(CA19-9)及鳞状细胞抗原(SCCAg)等五种标志物的水平。结果CEA特异性最高,达97.56%,Cyfra21-1最低,为73.17%;CEA、Cyfra21-1及NSE的敏感性分别在腺癌、鳞癌、小细胞肺癌中最高(分别为68.29%、62.30%、66.47%);Cyfra21-1、NSE在早期和晚期肺癌中的敏感性无显著性差异(P>0.05)。联合检测Cyfra21-1+CEA诊断肺癌的特异性和敏感性分别为70.73%和66.13%;同时检测3或4个标志物可提高诊断的敏感性,但特异性却明显降低;Cyfra21-1+CEA、Cyfra21-1+CA19-9诊断早期和晚期肺癌的敏感性无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论作为肺癌筛查指标,上述标志物均不理想;CEA>10μg/L对肺癌,尤其是腺癌的定性诊断有较大价值;Cyfra21-1和NSE分别是鳞癌和小细胞肺癌较好的标志物,两者在肺癌早期诊断中均可能有一定价值。Cyfra21-1+CEA可能是诊断肺癌(包括早期)的一个较佳组合。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic values of five detected tumor markers individually or in different combinations for lung cancer. Methods The serum levels of 5 tumor markers, including Cyfra21-1, CEA, NSE, CA19-9 and SCCAg, were assayed in 124 patients with lung cancer and 41 patients with benign lung disease using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Results CEA had the highest specificity of 97.56%, and Cyfra21-1 the lowest specificity of 73. 17% ; the highest sensitivity of CEA, Cyfra21-1and NSE were 68.29% in adenocarcinoma (P〈0.05), 62.30% in squamous cell carcinoma ( P〈0. 001 ) and 66.47% in small cell lung cancer (SCLC, P〈0. 005), respectively. The sensitivity of each of Cyfra21-1 and NSE in localized lung cancer was lower than that in advanced lung cancer, and no significant difference was found between them. The specificity and sensitivity of combined detection of Cyfra21-1 and CEA were 70.73% and 66. 13%, respectively. The combined measurement of the above three or four biomarkers increased the sensitivity, but the specificity obviously decreased. The sensitivities of the combined detection of Cyfra21-1 and CA19-9, especially Cyfra21-1 and CEA in localized lung cancer, were lower than those in advanced lung cancer, without statistical difference (P〉0.05). Conclusion Each of the five proteins could not be good screening marker for lung cancer. Serum CEA level with〉 10μg/L may be very valuable for diagnosis of lung cancer, especially for adenocarcinoma. Cyfra21-1 and NSE were better biomarkers for squamous cell carcinoma and SCLC, respectively. The combined detection of Cyfra21-1 and CEA could be used as a better pattern for diagnosis of lung cancer.
出处 《西安交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第4期352-354,364,共4页 Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University(Medical Sciences)
基金 陕西省科技攻关项目[2004K13-G3(3)]
关键词 肺癌 诊断 肿瘤标志物 lung cancer diagnosis tumor marker
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Spira A, Ettinger DS. Multidisciplinary management of lung cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(4):379-392.
  • 2杨德昌,杨拴盈.肺癌诊断水平的现状与进展[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2001,24(8):450-450. 被引量:78
  • 3车国卫,周清华.肺癌的筛查和早期诊断[J].中国肺癌杂志,2003,6(6):412-417. 被引量:31
  • 4Chen GA, Gharib TG, Huang CC, et al. Proteomic analysis of lung adenocarcinoma: identification of a highly expressed set of proteins in tumors [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2002, 8(13):2298-2305.
  • 5Molina R. Lung cancer markers: a valuable aid in diagnosis and therapy monitoring [J]. J Tumor Marker Oncol, 2004,19 (Suppl 4):79-80.
  • 6Luo SX, Wang MC, Li YB, et al. Clinical significance in diagnosing lung cancer with the combined determination of serum tumor markers [J]. J Tumor Marker Oncol, 2004, 19(Suppl 4):90.
  • 7沈关心 周汝麟.现代免疫学实验技术 [M](第二版)[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,2002.173-178.
  • 8张真发,马建群,孙楠,张林.血清癌胚抗原水平对于预测非小细胞肺癌术后早期复发的意义[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(13):817-819. 被引量:4
  • 9Zhong L, Peng XJ, Hidalgo GE, et al. Identification of circulating antibodies to tumor-associated proteins for combined use as markers of non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Proteomics, 2004,4 (4):1216-1225.

二级参考文献33

  • 1[1]James R. Screening and early dectection of lung cancer. Lung Cancer,2003,41(Suppl 3)∶S52.
  • 2[3]Edward F, Patz EF Jr. Screening for lung cancer. Lung Cancer,2003,41(Suppl 2)∶S73-S74.
  • 3[4]Flehinger BJ, Melamed MR. Current status of screening for lung cancer. Chest Surg Clin N Am,1994,4(1)∶1-15.
  • 4[5]Henschke CI. Early lung cancer action project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Cancer,2000,89(11 Suppl)∶2474-2482.
  • 5[6]Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H, et al. Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT vs radiography. Radiology,1996,201(3)∶798-802.
  • 6[7]Sone S, Li F, Yang ZG, et al. Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner. Br J Cancer,2001,84(1)∶25-32.
  • 7[8]David E, Stephen J, James R, et al. Evaluation of nodules detected by screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral computed tomography. Lung Cancer,2003,41(Suppl 2)∶S40.
  • 8[9]Kaneko M, Toshiaki K, Noriyuki M, et al.Screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT and sputum cytology: Results of Anti-Lung Cancer Association Project. Lung Cancer,2003,41(Suppl 2)∶S40.
  • 9[10]Melvyn S, Todd H, Lynn C, et al. Lung cancer screening with helical CT: Evidence for a stage shift? Lung Cancer,2003,41(Suppl 2)∶ S40-S41.
  • 10[11]Rob J, Harry J, Willem PTM, et al. Trial design and first screening results from the NEderLands-leuvens longkanker screening ONderzoek, a prospective randomized clinical trial on lung cancer screening by spiral CT. Lung Cancer,2003,41(Suppl 2)∶S158.

共引文献106

同被引文献134

引证文献16

二级引证文献185

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部