期刊文献+

静脉输液拔针后两种按压方法比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Two Compression Methods after Withdrawal of Needles at the End of Venous Transfusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 静脉输液是临床上治疗疾病的重要方法之一,也是应用最广泛的基本护理操作,为保护好静脉,减轻病人的痛苦和皮下瘀血,对2004年8~12月肿瘤科收住的120例(204次)肿瘤病患者,行静脉输液拔针的传统指压法与改进的直压法皮下瘀血情况及按压疼痛表现程度等两项指标进行了对照分析,结果二者均有显著性差异,直压法优于指压法. Venous transfusion is not only an important approach to cure diseases but also a basic nursing measure. To protect punctured veins and ease patients, the merits and demerits of tradtional digital compression and improved cotton- swab compression were carefully analysed. 120 Inpatients' (204 cases of venous transfusion, hospitalized in Dept. of Oncology from Aug. to Dec. 2004) range of subdemic stagnant blood and level of pain,which happened to the spot where the needle was punctured and compressed with two kinds of the compression hemostasis, were compared. The results suggested that cotton - swab compression is superior to digital compression.
出处 《内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版)》 2005年第4期475-476,共2页 Journal of Inner Mongolia Minzu University:Natural Sciences
关键词 静脉输液 拔针 比较 Venous transfusion Withdrawal of needles Comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献6

共引文献336

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部