期刊文献+

略论语言游戏与家族相似的矛盾 被引量:5

On the Contradiction Between Language Game and Family Resemblance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语言游戏是一个原子式的概念,它具有封闭性。而家族相似则是一个自否定的概念,它具有开放性。与许多论者以为语言游戏与家族相似是同一个概念或是一对相辅相成的概念不同,它们事实上是相互矛盾的。这一矛盾显示出维特根斯坦哲学的某些不彻底性。由于在这一矛盾中维特根斯坦倾向于语言游戏,所以他最后就不得不回到同是原子论的《逻辑哲学论》中的某些结论上去。 It can be drawn from Wittgenstein's text: each language game, just like an atom, has a feature of exclusiveness; and every family in the sense of family resemblance, on the contrary, has a feature of openness. Therefore, the concept language game and the concept family resemblance contradict each other. Many scholars, besides Wittgenstein himself often neglect this contradiction. Because Wittgenstein did not go far enough to apply the method of family resemblance thoroughly,finally he had to go back to some conclusions of Atomism.
出处 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2005年第3期15-20,124,共7页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 语言游戏 家族相似 维特根斯坦 Language game Family resemblance Wittgenstein
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[1]Wittgenstein. The Blue and Brown Books (BB) [M].Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980.
  • 2[2]Wittgenstein. Culture and Value (CV) [M].Chicago: University of Chicago, 1980.
  • 3[3]Wittgenstein. Lectures & Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief (LC)[M]. Berkeley and Angeles: University of California Press, 1967.
  • 4[4]Wittgenstein. Philosophical Grammar (PG) [M].Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1974.
  • 5[5]Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations (PI)[M].Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1963.
  • 6[6]Wittgenstein. Philosophical Occasions, 1912-1951(PO) [M]. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackert Publishing Company, 1993.
  • 7[7]Wittgenstein. Tractatus Logic - Philosophicus (TLP)[M]. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974.
  • 8[8]Wittgenstein. Zettel (Z) [M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1967.
  • 9[9]Baker G P, Hacker P M S. An Analytical Commentary on Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations (Vol. 1) [M ]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983.
  • 10[10]Fogelin R J. Wittgenstein [M ]. Bostion, London and Henley:Routledge and Kegan, 1980.

同被引文献28

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部