回儒修养理论比较——以清初回族思想家刘智《天方性理》为考察点

The Comparative study of the Theory of Hui Scholar Training——With a case of Tian Fang Xing Li written by Liu Zhi in the early Qing Dynasty

以往研究刘智回儒思想,多从宗教、哲学角度展开,①本文则从修养论展开,探讨回儒之学的同异,以弥补这方面研究的不足.本文比较、研究了刘智的回教心性论与修养论,认为它与理学的修养理论基本相同:两者无论在心性论的思路、分类、功能,还是在修养论的内容、次第、境界等方面,皆相近或相通.当然,回教与理学毕竟是两种文化,彼此也各有特点.本文还认为,修养论在回儒之学中都具有极重要地位,对于它们的比较、研究一定会大大促进彼此的了解、沟通,并为两种文化的融合奠定基础.

Liu Zhi＇ s research on Hui scholars always begins with the viewpoints of religion and philosophy. This article, however, starts with the viewpoint of Hui scholar training and looks at the Hui Scholar research in different aspects so as to make up for its inadequacies. By comparing the difference between the mental theory and the training theory, the author thinks that they are the same as the training theory of science. The two are not only similar to the thought, categorization and function of the mental theory but also to the content, order and realm of the training theory. In fact, Hui＇ s religion and science are two different cultures with different features. The author believes that the training theory is a key point in the study of Hui Scholars.