期刊文献+

不起诉案件听证探讨

Study on the Hearing of Nonprosecution Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 不起诉制度具有终止诉讼的效力,但不具备审判的公开性、中立性和当事人的参与性。因此,改革不起诉制度引入监督机制势在必行。笔者认为,相对于检察机关自侦的做不起诉处理的案件适用人民监督员制度而言,对于公安机关移送的做不起诉处理的案件,适用听证制度是比较好的选择。听证制度有利于案件的公正处理,更好地教育挽救被不起诉人,还能够强化检察机关的自由裁量权,提高诉讼效率。 The system of nonprosecution does not bear the the publicness, neutrality and participation of the parties in action when trial is conducted, though it has the effect of the termination of the lawsuit. Hence it is imperative to reform this system and introduce supervision system. The author's opinion is that it is a better choice to adopt the hearing system with the cases of nonprosecution transferred by the public security organ, while the cases of nonprosecution investigated by our procuratorial organ are suitable for the people's supervision system. The hearing system can contribute to the fair solution to the cases, educating and saving the person of nonprosecution better, resulting in consolidating the free judging power of the procuratorial organ and raise the lawsuit efficiency.
作者 麻立志
出处 《天津市政法管理干部学院学报》 2005年第3期68-70,共3页 Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law
关键词 不起诉 听证 人民监督员制度 nonprosecution hearing people's supervisor system
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献3

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部