期刊文献+

基于时序逻辑的多Agent系统协商模型及其推理与授权规则研究

Research on Negotiation Model of MAS Based on Linear-Time Temporal Logic and Its Reason and Accrediting Rules
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在文献[1]的基础上,对多Agent系统协商模型基于时序逻辑的方法进行了设计,给出了其形式化体系结构,同时给出了该模型的推理规则和授权规则。 In solving multi-agent system, we are faced with a series of questions of cooperation among agents, clearing up conflict, processing contradiction and so on, negotiation technology is key point in solving plan, it is also one of important contents on research of multi-agent system. In this paper, a negotiation model of multi-agent system based on lineartime temporal logic is presented and a formalized system of the model is given, and at the same time reason and accrediting rules are submitted.
出处 《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第9期833-836,共4页 Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University
基金 云南省重点科研基金资助项目(2001F0006Z) 云南省自然科学基金资助项目(2003F0038M)。
关键词 多AGENT系统 协商模型 时序逻辑 multi-agent system negotiation model temporal logic
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1李晶.基于能力与权力的协商公理体系多Agent系统模型[J].云南师范大学学报,2003,23(2).
  • 2石纯一 张伟.Agent研究进展[A]..知识科学与计算科学[C].北京:清华大学出版社,2003..
  • 3Norman T J, Sierra C, Nick R. Jennings Rights and Commitment in Multi-agent Agreement. http:∥www. nj. nec. com/cs, 1998
  • 4Rosenschein J S, Zlotkin G. Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation Among Computers. Boston. MIT Press, MA, 1994
  • 5孙瑜,夏幼明,李志平.多Agent系统模型及其应用[J].计算机工程与应用,2003,39(12):50-53. 被引量:9
  • 6Halpern J Y, Shoham Y. A Propositional Modal Logic of Time Intervals. Journal of the ACM, 1991, 38(4) :935-962
  • 7Mayfield J, Labrou Y, Finin T. Evaluating KQML as an Agent Communication Language. In: Wooldridge M, Muller I P, Tambe M, eds. Intelligent Agents II (LNAI Volume 1037 ). Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1996. 347-360

二级参考文献8

  • 1M Wooldridge,N R Jennings.Intelligent Agents:Theory and Practise [J].In Knowledge Engineering Review,1995;10(2).
  • 2R C Moore.A formal theory of knowledge and action[C].In:J F Allen, J Handler,A Tate eds.Readings in Planning,Morgan Kaufmann Publishers :San Mateo,CA, 1990:480-519.
  • 3P R Cohen,H J Levesque.Intention is choice with commitment[J].Artiflcial Intelligence, 1990;42:213-261.
  • 4A S Rao,M P Georgeff.An abstract architecture for rational agents [C].In:C Rich,W Swartout,B Nebel eds.Proceedings of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning(KR&R-92), 1992:439-449.
  • 5R Scherl ,H Levesque.The frame problem and knowledge-producing actions[C].In:Pmceedings of the Eleventh National Conference on Artiticial Intelligence(AAAI-93) ,Washington DC, 1993:689-695.
  • 6R Faginl J Y Halpem, Y Moses et al.Reasonlng About Knowledge [M].The MIT Press:Cambridge,MA,1995.
  • 7M Wooldridge,A Lomuscio.Reasoning about Visibility,Perception and Knowledge[C].In :N R Jennings,Y Lesperance eds.Intelligence VIProceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and languages (ATAL-99), lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Spfinger-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.
  • 8M Wooldridge,A Lomuscio.A Compu-tationally Grounded Logic of Visibility,Perception,and Knowledge[J].In Logic Journal of the IGPL, 2001 ;9(2) :273-288.

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部