期刊文献+

从认知语言学角度看英汉语时间概念隐喻的差异 被引量:1

A Comparative Study of Differences in Chinese and English Time Conceptual metaphors from the Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英汉语在“时间是空间”、“时间流逝是运动”、“时间是金钱”、“时间是实体”等主要时间概念隐喻及相应的语言表达形式中虽有很多相同之处,但也存在着差异。这些差异来源于英汉不同的认知和社会文化背景。 In Chinese and English, there exist the differences in those major time conceptual metaphors, such as TIME IS SPACE, TIME PASSING IS MOTION, TIME IS MONEY, TIME IS ENTITY and the relevant metaphor- ical representations. Despite the overwhelming similarities, these differences result from the different cognitive and sociocuhural backgrounds.
作者 龚萍
出处 《长江大学学报(社会科学版)》 2005年第4期104-106,共3页 Journal of Yangtze University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 时间 概念隐喻 差异 文化背景 time conceptual metaphors differences cultural background
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1赵艳芳.语言的隐喻认知结构——《我们赖以生存的隐喻》评介[J].外语教学与研究,1995,27(3):67-72. 被引量:357
  • 2[2]Huang, Shuan-fun. Time and the Semantics of LAI and QU[C].In Robert Cheng, Ying-chi tang (eds), Proceedings of the Symposium on Chinese Linguistics, LinguisticsInstitute of the Linguistic Society of America. 1977.
  • 3[3]Gentner, Dedre. Spacial Metaphors in Temporal Reasoning.[C]In M. Gattis (ED) Spatial Schemas in Abstract Thought.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 2001.
  • 4[4]赖姿吟.中文时间观点的心理语言学处理[D].台湾大学,2002.
  • 5周榕,黄希庭.中英文时间表征的对比探析[J].西南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1999,31(1):70-75. 被引量:11

共引文献365

同被引文献18

  • 1王寅.再论语言的体验性——认知语言学的语言体验观[J].山东外语教学,2005,26(2):3-8. 被引量:60
  • 2汪少华.从时间隐喻看隐喻的双重性[J].外语与外语教学,2006(2):58-60. 被引量:10
  • 3Celee-Murica, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. The Grammar Book- An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course [ M]. Newbury House Publishers, Inc, 1983.
  • 4Coulson, S. & Matlock, T. Metaphor and Space Structure in Model [J]. Metaphor and Symbol, 2001.
  • 5Evans, V. The Structure of Time : Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition [ M ]. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2003.
  • 6Gentner, D. As Time Goes by: Evidence for Two Systems in Processing Space-time Metaphors [ J ]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2002 ( 17 ).
  • 7Jesperson, O. Essentials of English Grammar [ M ]. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1933.
  • 8Johnson, M. & Lakoff, G. Why Cognitive Linguistics Requires Embodied Realism. [ J ]. Cognitive Linguistics, 2002.
  • 9Johnson, M. The Body in the Mind: the Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason [ M ]. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 10Joos, M. The English Verb : Form and Meaning [ M]. Madison: the University of Wisconsin Press, 1964.

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部