期刊文献+

我国晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗作用现状分析 被引量:3

The Present Status Chemotherapy for Advanced NSCLC in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]评价我国非小细胞肺癌的化疗现状。[方法]收集符合分析的国内文献54篇,累计病例2485,每个研究的中位病例数为37;随访研究13个,中位随访时间为9个月;采用SPSS统计分析治疗反应率,治疗方案、周期、费用与疗效的关系。[结果]平均有效率为46.3%,95%CI为43%~50%。方案以GP方案疗效最好,而CAP方案最低(51.4%vs30.5%,χ2=11.3,P<0.05),采用新药的方案要优于以前的方案;4周期化疗方案可能优于2周期方案,但无统计学差异;疗效与医疗费用存在关系,但缺乏对照研究。[结论]我国NSCLC化疗效果与国外资料相似,但因病例数目少,资料不全面,统计方法落后,难以得出可靠的、令人信服的结论。 [Purpose]To evaluate the present status of chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China.[Methods]Fifty-four domestic literatures were collected for analysis. A total of was 2 485 patients was in the literatus with median 37 number in 1 literatare; The median period of follow-up was 9 months in 13 literature.The response rate, regimens, courses, costs and efficacy was assessed by SPSS software. [Results] The averaged response rate was 46.3%( 95%CI=43%~50%). GP regimen was the highest response rate to chemotherapy but CAP regimen was the lowest one(51.4% vs 30.5%, χ2=11.3, P<0.05).The regimens with new agents were better than that with common agents. Four cycles of chemotherapy might be more appropriate than 2 cycles although there were no significant difference.Chemotherapeutic cost was correlated to response rate,however,well-controlled studies were required to adequately evaluate. [Conclusions]The efficacy of chemotherapy for NSCLC in China is similar to foreign literatures. However,it is hard to make a reliable conclusion because of small samples,incompletive data and simple statistic assay.
机构地区 湖北省肿瘤医院
出处 《中国肿瘤》 CAS 2005年第9期611-613,共3页 China Cancer
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 化学疗法 non-small cell lung cancer chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1吴一龙,廖美琳,蒋国樑,周清华,张明和,张熙增,汪蕙,王思愚,谷力加.局部晚期非小细胞肺癌诊断治疗之共识[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2002,24(6):576-578. 被引量:100
  • 2Spira A, Ettinger DS. Multidisciplinary management of lung cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350:379-392.
  • 3Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group.Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a metaanalysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials[J]. BMJ, 1995, 311 (7010):899-909.
  • 4Bailar JC. Passive smoking, coronary heart disease, and meta-analysis[J]. N Engl J Med, 1999,340(12):958-959.
  • 5范黎,任军,刘文超,李永琦,葛乐,盛蓉,张燕军,朱延光.非小细胞肺癌三种化疗新方案的药物经济学评价[J].中国肺癌杂志,2002,5(1):54-57. 被引量:12
  • 6Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-smallcell lung cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346:92-98.
  • 7Rodriguez J, Cortes J, Calvo E, et al. Paclitaxel, cisplatin,and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy within a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 2000, 89(12):2622-2629.
  • 8Peppercorn JM, Weeks JC, Cook EF, et al. Comparison of outcomes in cancer patients treated within and outside clinical trials: conceptual framework and structured review[J]. Lancet,2004, 363(9405):263-270.

二级参考文献2

共引文献110

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部