期刊文献+

研究质量分级和证据信度评价在循证实践中的应用 被引量:1

Applying of research in quality classification and reliability evaluation of evidence in evident based practice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在制订临床实践指南和治疗标准之前,对相关研究的质量进行分级,并对研究证据的信度进行评价,能够有效提高实践指南和治疗标准的科学性,进而提高医疗的质量。本文对研究质量分级和证据信度评价的相关概念和方法作了简要的介绍。
作者 于勇 陈英耀
出处 《中国卫生质量管理》 2005年第4期70-72,共3页 Chinese Health Quality Management
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Harris R,Lohr KN.Screening for prostate cancer:an update of the evidence[].Annals of Internal Medicine.2002
  • 2Mulrow CD,Lohr KN.Proof and policy from medical research evidence[].Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law.2001
  • 3Kassirer JP,Cecil JS.Inconsistency in evidentiary standards for medical testimony: disorder in the courts[].The Journal of The American Medical Association.2002
  • 4Lohr KN,Eleazar K,Mauskopf J.Health policy issues and applications for evidence-based medicine and clinical practice guidelines[].Health Policy.1998
  • 5Thompson DC,McPhillips H,Davis RL,Lieu TL,Homer CJ,Helfand M.Universal newborn hearing screenings:summary of evidence[].The Journal of The American Medical Association.2001
  • 6Hayden M,Pignone M,Phillips C,Mulrow C.Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events:a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force[].Annals of Internal Medicine.2002
  • 7Eddy DM.The use of evidence and cost effectiveness by the courts:How can it improve health care[].Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law.2001
  • 8Pignone M,Rich M,Teutsch SM,Berg AO,Lohr KN.Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force[].Annals of Internal Medicine.2002

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部