期刊文献+

增强剂量CTOP方案治疗NHL临床观察 被引量:4

Clinical Trial in non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma's Treatment with Escalated CTOP Regimen (A Preliminary Report)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察增强剂量CTOP方案治疗NHL(非霍奇金淋巴瘤)的疗效及不良反应,进而探讨提高THP(吡柔比星)在联合化疗方案中的剂量强度的安全性。方法:39例初治NHL随机分为两组分别接受常规剂量CTOP(THP40mg/m2)和增强剂量CTOP(THP60mg/m2)方案化疗至少2疗程,观察疗效及不良反应。结果:增强剂量CTOP与常规剂量CTOP方案相比完全缓解率有所提高(47.4%:21.1%),达到完全缓解的时间也缩短(P<0.01);而且提高THP剂量强度后并未增加心脏毒性、脱发及骨髓抑制等不良反应的发生,两组的不良反应发生率及严重程度相仿,无显著性差异。结论:增强剂量CTOP方案治疗NHL可提高疗效而不加重不良反应,增强剂量吡柔比星可安全使用。 Objective:To evaluate the response of escalated CTOP consisting of increased dose THP(60mg/m^2)in NHL and clarify how the side-effect oceur (especially for the occurrecce of cardiotoxicity)when the total dose of THP(pirarubicin)is increased.To study the safty of increasing the dose of THP.Methods:From August 2001 to May 2003,39 patients with chemonaive NHL(non Hodgkin's lymphoma)received either escalated CTOP(n=19) or conventional CTOP(n=20).All these patients received 2 cycles chemotherapy at least.The response and side effect were observed after receiving chemotherapy.Results:Escalated CTOP achieved better complete remission rate thar conventional CTOP(47.4%vs21.1%).Time to achieved complete remission was shortened,too(P〈0.01).As to the side effect the escalated CTOP is similar to conventional CTOP.There was no significant difference between the two protocols.Conclusion:Incerment of the THP dose consisted in CTOP regimen can improve efficacy.On the other hand,chemotherpapy-induced toxicity was not significant intensified when dose of THP increased.The escalated THP can be used safely.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第17期988-990,997,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
关键词 吡柔比星 非霍奇金淋巴瘤 CTOP Pirarubicin THP NHL CTOP
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahibery S, et al. Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimen for advanced non-Hodgkin's ymphoma [J]. N Engl J Med,1993, 328(14):1002- 1006.
  • 2Messori A,Vaiani M, Trippoli S, et al. Survival in patients with inter--medlate or high grade Non--Hodgkin's lymphoma: meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing third generation regimen with CHOP [J]. BrJ Cancer, 2001, 84(3):303-307.
  • 3Gordon LI, Harrlng D, Anderson J, et al. Comparison of a second-generation combination chemotherapeutic regimen (m--BACOD) with a standard regimen (CHOP)for advanced diffuse Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [J]. N Engl J Med, 1992, 327 (19):1342 - 1349.
  • 4Meyer RM, Hryniuk WM, Goodyear MD. The role of dose intensity in determing outcome in intermediate-grade Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas[J].J Clin Oncol, 1991.9(2):339-347.
  • 5Tsurumi H. Yamada T, Sawada M. et al. Biweekly CHOP or THP-COP regimens in the treatment of newly diagnosed aggressive non--Hodgkin's lymphoma. A comparison of doxorubicin and pirarubicin: a randomized phase U study [J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2004, 130(2):107- 113.
  • 6Niitsu N, Umeda M, Response and adverse drug reaction to comblnation in patients with aggress non--Hodgkln's lymphoma comparison of CHOP , COP-BLM , COP-BLAM Ⅲ, THP--COPBLM [J], EurJ Haematol, 1999, 63(5):337-344.
  • 7Niltsu N, Umada M. Biweekly THP--COPBLM (pirarubicln,CTX, Pred, BLM and PCI) regimen combined with granulocyte colony--sdmulatlng factor for intermediate and high-grade non Hodgkin's lymphoma [J]. Leukemia, 1998, 12(9):1457-1460.
  • 8Trotti A, Byhardt R, Stetz J, et al. Common Toxicity Criteria(CTC)[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000, 47(1):17-46.
  • 9Feng B, Sitek A, Gullberg GT. Calculation of the left ventrlcular ejection raction without edge detection: Application to small hearts[J].J Nucl Med, 2002, 43(6):786-794.
  • 10Takagi T, Oguro M. (2"-R)-4'-o-tetrahydropyranyladriamycin,a new anthracycline derlvadve; its effectiveness in lymphoid mafignancies[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1987, 20(2):151 - 154.

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部