期刊文献+

Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the post-MRCP era: A tertiary center experience 被引量:21

Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the post-MRCP era: A tertiary center experience
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To evaluate our experience in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) in terms of fulfilling the ASGE guidelines in indications, positive findings,and complications in the post-magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) era.METHODS: Between November 2001 and February 2003, consecutive ERCP cases were prospectively evaluated with regard to the indications, findings, cannulation techniques,devices used during the procedure, sedation given,duration of procedure, and complications. These data were entered in a database for subsequent processing and analysis.RESULTS: Of 336 cases, 21.4% were diagnostic and 78.6% therapeutic ERCP. The indications for ERCP fulfilled the ASGE guidelines in 323 cases (96.1%). Suspected bile duct stone was the most frequent indication (26.8%), and this was followed by cholangitis (24.4%), dilated common bile duct (14.9%), and cholestatic jaundice (13.4%).Cannulation success rate was 94%. Biliary sphincterotomy was performed in 175 (52.1%) patients. Repeated ERCP was performed on 31.5% of the patients. Overall, the complication rate was 9.8% with 0.3% being procedurerelated mortality. The complications were pancreatitis (5.4%), bleeding (0.8%), cholangitis (2.4%) and others (1.5%). No significant difference was observed between the complication rate and the type of ERCP performed.CONCLUSION: Our study showed that post-ERCP complication rate was comparable with the other large prospective studies and there was no difference in the complication between the diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. AZM: To evaluate our experience in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) in terms of fulfilling the ASGE guidelines in indications, positive findings, and complications in the post-magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) era. METHODS: Between November 2001 and February 2003, consecutive ERCP cases were prospectively evaluated with regard to the indications, findings, cannulation techniques, devices used during the procedure, sedation given, duration of procedure, and complications. These data were entered in a database for subsequent processing and analysis. RESULTS: Of 336 cases, 21.4% were diagnostic and 78.6% therapeutic ERCR The indications for ERCP fulfilled the ASGE guidelines in 323 cases (96.1%). Suspected bile duct stone was the most frequent indication (26.8%), and this was followed by cholangitis (24.4%), dilated common bile duct (14.9%), and cholestatic jaundice (23.4%). Cannulation success rate was 94%. Biliary sphincterotomy was performed in 175 (52.1%) patients. Repeated ERCP was performed on 31.5% of the patients. Overall, the complication rate was 9.8% with 0.3% being procedurerelated mortality. The complications were pancreatitis (5.4%), bleeding (0.8%), cholangitis (2.4%) and others (1.5%). No significant difference was observed between the complication rate and the type of ERCP performed. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that post-ERCP complication rate was comparable with the other large prospective studies and there was no difference in the complication between the diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第33期5209-5212,共4页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 并发症 内窥镜 胆管造影术 磁共振检查 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram Complication Pancreatitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1McCune WS, Shorb PE, Moscovitz H. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of Vater: a preliminary report. Ann Surg 1968; 167:752-756.
  • 2Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Katon RM. Complications ofendoscopic retrograde cholagiopancreatography (ERCP): A study of 10000 cases. Gastroenterology 1996; 70:314-320.
  • 3Sherman S, Lehman GA. ERCP andendoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis. Pancreas 1991; 6:350-367.
  • 4Roszler H, Campbell WL. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: association with urographic visualization during ERCP. Radiology 1985; 157:595-598.
  • 5Reiertsen O, Skjoto J, Jacobsen CD, Rosseland AR. Complications of fibreoptic gastrointestinal endoscopy-Five year sexperience in a central hospital. Endoscopy 1987; 19:1-6.
  • 6Vennes JA, Ament M, Boyce HW Jr, Cotton PB, Jensen DM,Ravich WJ, Sugawa C, Wu WC, Sanowski RA, Ament M.Principals of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Standards of Training Committees. 1989-1990. Gastrointestinal Endosc 1992; 38:743 - 746.
  • 7Scheeres DE, Simon I, Ponsky JL. Endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography in a general surgery practice. Am Surg 1990; 56:185-191.
  • 8Farrell RJ, Mahmud N, Noonan N, Kelleher D, Keeling PW.Diagnostics and therapeutic ERCP: a large single centre's experience. Ir J Med Sci 2001; 170:176-180.
  • 9Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, Wong RC, Ferrari APJr, Montes H, Roston AD, Slivka A, Lichtenstein DR, Ruymann FW, Van Dam J, Hughes M, Carr-Locke DL. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56:652-656.
  • 10Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ,Lande JD, Pheley AM. Complication of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Eng J Med 1996; 335:909-918.

同被引文献125

引证文献21

二级引证文献298

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部