期刊文献+

非自愿性口供的排除规则——从刑讯逼供角度的分析 被引量:3

The exclusionary rule for involuntary oral statements——from the perspective of torture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于涉及到口供和排除规则这些重要问题,非自愿性口供的排除规则受到了我国学者的普遍关注,但是,现在对该规则本身的研究还不够深入。本文从刑讯逼供的角度出发,对于排除规则中的几个要素,如“刑讯逼供”的含义、排除模式、“毒树之果”规则、排除后果等进行了分析,希望能够加深我们对于该问题的理解。 For it deals with oral statements and exclusionary rule, the exclusionary rule for involuntary oral statements certainly attracts the scholars attention. But the research on this rule is not good enough. From the perspective of torture, I analyse certain elements of the rule: the meaning of torture, the pattern of exclusionary rule, fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine and the outcome of the exclusionary rule. I wish this analysis will deepen our understanding of this issue.
作者 褚福民
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《法学论坛》 北大核心 2005年第5期26-29,共4页 Legal Forum
关键词 排除规则 非自愿性口供 刑讯逼供 排除模式 “毒树之果”规则 排除后果 the exclusionary rule involuntary oral statement extorting a confession by torture the pattern of exclusionary rule fruit of the poisonoustree doctrine the outcome of the exclusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献5

  • 1Joel Samaha, Criminal Procedure, p.461.
  • 2Michael Zander, The police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, revised second edition, Sweet & Maxwell, 1990, p. 198.
  • 3Michael Zander, The police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, revised second edition, Sweet & Maxwell. Peter Murphy, Murphy on Evidence, Blackstone Press Limited, 1995, pp. 69-70.
  • 4Joel Samaha,Criminal Procedure,Wadsworth Publishing Company,1999,p.431.
  • 5Joel Samaha,Criminal Procedure,Wadsworth Publishing Company,另参见Wayne R.LaFave and Jerold H.Israel,Criminal Procedure,second edition,West Publishing Co.,1992,pp.459—498.

共引文献160

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部