摘要
目的:比较米氮平与丁螺环酮治疗广泛性焦虑症的疗效及不良反应。方法:将符合CCMD-III诊断标准的64例广泛性焦虑症患者随机分为两组,分别服米氮平或丁螺环酮治疗6周,于疗前和疗后第6周末进行汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、临床疗效总评(CG I-SI)和副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应。结果:米氮平和丁螺环酮疗效相仿,但躯体焦虑因子分有显著性差异。两组不良反应均轻而易耐受。结论:米氮平是治疗广泛性焦虑症的安全有效药物,更适用于伴重性抑郁的广泛性焦虑症。
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of mirtazapine and buspirone in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Methods:Sixty - four patients with generalized anxiety disorder met the criteria of CCMD -Ⅲ were randomly assigned to receive mirtazapine ( n = 34 ) or buspirone ( n = 30 ). HAMA, SAS, CGI - SI and TESS were adopted to evaluate the efficacy and side effects before and after six weeks of the treatment. Results: The efficacy of mirtazapine and buspirone had no significant difference, but mirtazapine was better than buspirone in the treatment of physical anxiety patient. They had slighter side effects. Conclusions:Mirtazapine is a safe and effective drug in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder, suiting for generalized anxiety disorder with major depression.
出处
《中国民康医学》
2005年第9期495-496,共2页
Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词
米氮平
丁螺环酮
广泛性焦虑症
mirtazapine
buspirone
generalized anxiety disorder