从赔偿与补偿的界限看我国《国家赔偿法》的修改方向

On the Base of the Difference between Indemnity and Compensation,the Study on the Amendment of Chinese National Indemnity Act

传统上对赔偿与补偿的界限的认识,都从违法性开始。但是,随着“结果违法说”的兴起和过失的客观化,同时,赔偿与补偿的理论基础的趋同,赔偿与补偿的界限正在消弭。这一现象应当引起我们对传统上研究国家赔偿的方法的反思。同时,也对我国的《国家赔偿法》的修改方向以及行政赔偿如何立法产生影响。在此情况下,有必要重构国家赔偿与行政补偿的要件。

Traditionally, the difference between indenmity and compensation begins with the illegality. However, with the appearance of the result-illegality theory and the objectivity of fault, the difference of indenmity and compensation is disappearing. At the same time, the essential theory＇s unity of indemnity and compensation causes the difference of indemnity and compensation to disappear. This trend should let us rethink the traditional method in studying on the indemnity act. As a result, it will have an effect on the amendment of Chinese National Indemnity Act and the administrative compensation legislation. According to this situation, it is necessary to reconstruct the framework of national indemnity and administrative compensation.