期刊文献+

张载理观探微——兼论朱熹理气观与张载虚气观的关系问题 被引量:16

Chang Tsai’s Theory of Principle ——Discussing Concurrently the Relationship between Chu His’s Theory of Principle and Ether and Chang Tsai’s Theory of Void and Ether
原文传递
导出
摘要 In the academic field, there are two following phenomena that it is generally believed that Chang Tsai pays more attention to the concept of Ether than of Principle, and that Chang Tsai’s principle has not been given proper position. Accordingly, this paper explores Chang Tsai’s theory of principle from two sides. Firstly, it discusses three basic meanings about the concept of Chang Tsai’s principle, namely, “all things on the earth have principles”, “reach and go back the heaven’s principle” and “the proper behavior (Li) is principle”. Secondly, from the perspective of the whole and the part, the paper inquires about the position of the principle in Chang Tsai’s philosophy, thinking that the position of principle is equal to the Way (Dao), but as the secondary category under the concept of Heaven and not the highest ontology. By the way, it finally discusses and refutes the argument that Chu Hsi’s theory of principle and ether comes mainly from Chang Tsai’s theory of void and ether proposed by some scholars. In the academic field, there are two following phenomena that it is generally believed that Chang Tsai pays more attention to the concept of Ether than of Principle, and that Chang Tsai’s principle has not been given proper position. Accordingly, this paper explores Chang Tsai’s theory of principle from two sides. Firstly, it discusses three basic meanings about the concept of Chang Tsai’s principle, namely, “all things on the earth have principles”, “reach and go back the heaven’s principle” and “the proper behavior (Li) is principle”. Secondly, from the perspective of the whole and the part, the paper inquires about the position of the principle in Chang Tsai’s philosophy, thinking that the position of principle is equal to the Way (Dao), but as the secondary category under the concept of Heaven and not the highest ontology. By the way, it finally discusses and refutes the argument that Chu Hsi’s theory of principle and ether comes mainly from Chang Tsai’s theory of void and ether proposed by some scholars.
作者 林乐昌
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第8期24-30,共7页 Philosophical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1.《张载集》[M].中华书局,1978年版.第324页.
  • 2.《朱子语类》[M].中华书局,1986年版.第1714页.
  • 3丁为祥.《“理先气后”与“虚气相即”—朱子理气观的诠释与比较》[A].朱杰人主编.《纪念朱熹诞辰870周年逝世800周年论文集》[C].华东师范大学出版社,2001年..
  • 4丁伟志.张载理气观析疑[J].中国社会科学,1980(4):123-142. 被引量:7
  • 5林乐昌.《张载“太虚即气”命题散论》[A]..《气化之道—张载哲学新论》[C].陕西人民教育出版社,1992年..
  • 6林乐昌.张载对儒家人性论的重构[J].哲学研究,2000(5):48-54. 被引量:33
  • 7楼宇烈.《王弼集校释》[M].中华书局,1980年.第112页.
  • 8卫湜.《礼记集说》,清《通志堂经解》本[M].,..

二级参考文献2

  • 1.《皇极经世》卷七上.中州古籍出版社,1992年版.第323页.
  • 2.《观物外篇》上.中州古籍出版社,1992年版.第323页.

共引文献169

同被引文献158

引证文献16

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部